From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: dwarves@vger.kernel.org, alan.maguire@oracle.com,
acme@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] bpf: Re-define bpf_wq_set_callback as magic kfunc
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 17:16:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c03a5ebfadf924be0ab0679a48d33d323d7ea7e5.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251029190113.3323406-6-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
On Wed, 2025-10-29 at 12:01 -0700, Ihor Solodrai wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 67914464d503..3c9e963d879b 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
[...]
> @@ -12916,9 +12919,10 @@ static bool is_bpf_throw_kfunc(struct bpf_insn *insn)
> insn->imm == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_throw];
> }
>
> -static bool is_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> +static bool is_bpf_wq_set_callback_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> {
> - return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl];
> + return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl] ||
> + btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_wq_set_callback];
If insn->imm is patched in add_kfunc_call() there will be no need to
handle two cases here.
> }
>
> static bool is_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
> @@ -14035,7 +14039,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
> meta.r0_rdonly = false;
> }
>
> - if (is_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl_kfunc(meta.func_id)) {
> + if (is_bpf_wq_set_callback_kfunc(meta.func_id)) {
> err = push_callback_call(env, insn, insn_idx, meta.subprogno,
> set_timer_callback_state);
> if (err) {
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
> index 2cd9165c7348..68a49b1f77ae 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
Nit: The tests won't fail with the above changes, right?
If so, we usually ship changes to selftests in separate patches.
> @@ -580,11 +580,6 @@ extern void bpf_iter_css_destroy(struct bpf_iter_css *it) __weak __ksym;
>
> extern int bpf_wq_init(struct bpf_wq *wq, void *p__map, unsigned int flags) __weak __ksym;
> extern int bpf_wq_start(struct bpf_wq *wq, unsigned int flags) __weak __ksym;
> -extern int bpf_wq_set_callback_impl(struct bpf_wq *wq,
> - int (callback_fn)(void *map, int *key, void *value),
> - unsigned int flags__k, void *aux__ign) __ksym;
> -#define bpf_wq_set_callback(timer, cb, flags) \
> - bpf_wq_set_callback_impl(timer, cb, flags, NULL)
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-30 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-29 19:01 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] bpf: magic kernel functions Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] bpf: Add BTF_ID_LIST_END and BTF_ID_LIST_SIZE macros Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 19:41 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-29 20:44 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 23:54 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] bpf: Refactor btf_kfunc_id_set_contains Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 23:55 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] bpf: Support for kfuncs with KF_MAGIC_ARGS Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 19:41 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-29 20:49 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 23:59 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-29 23:54 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 0:03 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-30 16:31 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 17:26 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 10:24 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-30 11:58 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-30 13:54 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] bpf: Support __magic prog_aux arguments for kfuncs Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] bpf: Re-define bpf_wq_set_callback as magic kfunc Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 0:16 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/8] bpf,docs: Document KF_MAGIC_ARGS flag and __magic annotation Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 0:21 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] bpf: Re-define bpf_task_work_schedule_* kfuncs as magic Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/8] bpf: Re-define bpf_stream_vprintk as a magic kfunc Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 0:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] bpf: magic kernel functions Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 6:11 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 18:14 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 18:24 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 18:37 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 18:26 ` Alan Maguire
2025-10-30 18:42 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 18:46 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 19:47 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-30 20:02 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 20:38 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c03a5ebfadf924be0ab0679a48d33d323d7ea7e5.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwarves@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox