From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [62.89.141.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96DF8323E; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 00:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749430223; cv=none; b=Uo5EFyE7rA2DnnpLxKTsWf5rBjV0CS4GxuW9ZW0kX13wtE3rFYyzvj6D3CUn6Mw2fdhsq3gaRtS/xFRVVRfYnolic6KiwHNWPp6IvwM1bwKa/VqU/91huomVucD7ePfr9Ptohf//4iZzwR01Q5DdyEQtYKEE4+BFbTEbhDr5tuc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749430223; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+AHHggyZBEcEEMErS+Gtpy0ufYcQF85fKYdZ5jK/L98=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oUoWvwThVBMgOGQTYttuARs4E06tA5RrtpAW1uvBKX18EXk15Pe5xI9NlozZgicqeMklPGIOoukE0oeKaOkPpqJslgsprpRxprjiOHAQ5+m8iVHbViokOTGi/RqvVVrtzefLKr+UtA6jzAOvFMDBfG4gQHL9P0aOZ60DWg4YADI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b=BCerGfG/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b="BCerGfG/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=m12yZClFLfVZgzwkAkP0PbBmZAZomHK6sN59s6Zq+Js=; b=BCerGfG/TETnXb1pBHyDSw9J43 SItMVXL6Jo0eKq8/+GQwg3y2lqipzDlWqEPixlpzJrikZColJbRdihZzUVcE76D3TmPLlEtQUm7/c Uw6DbRmWpS5XZ11SVeqsfApdK7phZ2l+sQGQxNp+/PlvBUU9xCsgnOKWEUxOl7lMFJnxCWxQk+HCn W9gu1aYq7SL2007L8+Q8jgr/AoHC1UUuFGICFh8XXV2XlcF1+h5UU94Y2SwNIJBLRh4cU843UAxfg r1J+ofXM3c+yFQPypGOXWFXs4jLSAZ9rhuqdsb6HrfdWP9lRpePpWFO8X4RC+vdghzZQc1G+xTKJO xMEz9IkA==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uOQiH-00000006Gi5-1kLQ; Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:50:09 +0000 Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 01:50:09 +0100 From: Al Viro To: NeilBrown Cc: Christian Brauner , Jan Kara , Chuck Lever , Jeff Layton , Amir Goldstein , Jan Harkes , David Howells , Tyler Hicks , Miklos Szeredi , Carlos Maiolino , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, coda@cs.cmu.edu, codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Change vfs_mkdir() to unlock on failure. Message-ID: <20250609005009.GB299672@ZenIV> References: <20250608230952.20539-1-neil@brown.name> <20250608230952.20539-6-neil@brown.name> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250608230952.20539-6-neil@brown.name> Sender: Al Viro On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 09:09:37AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > Proposed changes to directory-op locking will lock the dentry rather > than the whole directory. So the dentry will need to be unlocked. Please, repost your current proposal _before_ that one goes anywhere.