From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7B79275AFD; Wed, 29 Oct 2025 12:55:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761742535; cv=none; b=F/EERNzyoCEgj24pHswBSjvSc24dBhHzsSRfJwLPgf+7lmPRls37TlK6IKK4MYpIm/cbAG1DyzqTE1iefIzT6Pz8fr21swtDYacpTr/WWkrS6CxCcCADt4FqNnrmwnMasVQouc90ofkCVf6AbSteUY74MEO0gGhNP3MWHTEN6DM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761742535; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0CzE2vJmUarjE3+QMrd+j0mHeIz5jGi5cgcCV2j7Gto=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FkZn9sfhZTevY7ZKAozwJ3nCEW28qJ4zDK0KZq7rHfxW5pjH94st+ANQVaXmvpF1TFBECS/RtFRkmin48jMm5NVlz+KNj/3SJXlJFklvUJYr/G6Ok72BBhKrnXsj1I5f5ik6cfSo+yFL0fUDs0Q9AanY7jFxyT+2TkJBVvlNRsU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ur6Ekr2s; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ur6Ekr2s" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EA4FC4CEF7; Wed, 29 Oct 2025 12:55:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761742535; bh=0CzE2vJmUarjE3+QMrd+j0mHeIz5jGi5cgcCV2j7Gto=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ur6Ekr2sxpK9kC1PNi5PiLCDzlSRO6FM0+oaVL0Fz8YUh5SxgvQXiBvK9gL9vzX1y FJHfJrBxfhcUwe5dZlRw6ODhiRJl/EJm2rWbu5QrVsPtIdVs3alSnIez2tiAIWH6/h ox/2F95UyuvJYNXfLY2SCq3uBNnh9JIw+5PQXbGVm6nDZmKCjPdaqJF4gD6WZNIxfM +O9W7KhgM63n0OUdWoExlc/9tbhDAscPQvz7uiqUs93Re9GNmMrnQsoYwuL1lG1HkW z3MMcgndaOWm17okctdlh7QveqspiHKAXE5wiW4Qgxh8V7dEAnzHTEFQv2U98huZ28 lcdMvlRM8I1iw== Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 13:55:24 +0100 From: Christian Brauner To: Jeff Layton Cc: Miklos Szeredi , Alexander Viro , Jan Kara , Chuck Lever , Alexander Aring , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , Steve French , Paulo Alcantara , Ronnie Sahlberg , Shyam Prasad N , Tom Talpey , Bharath SM , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Danilo Krummrich , David Howells , Tyler Hicks , NeilBrown , Olga Kornievskaia , Dai Ngo , Amir Goldstein , Namjae Jeon , Steve French , Sergey Senozhatsky , Carlos Maiolino , Kuniyuki Iwashima , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] vfs: recall-only directory delegations for knfsd Message-ID: <20251029-visuell-gluthitze-e321cef788d0@brauner> References: <20251021-dir-deleg-ro-v3-0-a08b1cde9f4c@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251021-dir-deleg-ro-v3-0-a08b1cde9f4c@kernel.org> On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 11:25:35AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > Behold, another version of directory delegations. This version contains > support for recall-only delegations. Support for CB_NOTIFY will be > forthcoming (once the client-side patches have caught up). > > This main differences in this version are bugfixes, but the last patch > adds a more formal API for userland to request a delegation. That > support is optional. We can drop it and the rest of the series should be > fine. > > My main interest in making delegations available to userland is to allow > testing this support without nfsd. I have an xfstest ready to submit for > this if that support looks acceptable. If it is, then I'll also plan to > submit an update for fcntl(2). > > Christian, Chuck mentioned he was fine with you merging the nfsd bits > too, if you're willing to take the whole pile. Absolutely!