From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
Cc: Tyler Hicks <code@tyhicks.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Zipeng Zhang <zhangzipeng0@foxmail.com>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ecryptfs: streamline offset formatting in ecryptfs_derive_iv
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 15:05:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260329220505.GB2106@quark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260329212325.371720-2-thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
On Sun, Mar 29, 2026 at 11:23:25PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> Use the number of characters written by scnprintf() to zero-pad the
> remaining bytes, instead of clearing the buffer first and then writing
> the offset.
[...]
> + size_t len;
[...]
> memcpy(src, crypt_stat->root_iv, crypt_stat->iv_bytes);
> - memset((src + crypt_stat->iv_bytes), 0, 16);
> - snprintf((src + crypt_stat->iv_bytes), 16, "%lld", offset);
> + len = scnprintf(src + crypt_stat->iv_bytes, 16, "%lld", offset) + 1;
> + memset(src + crypt_stat->iv_bytes + len, 0, 16 - len);
This isn't exactly "streamlining" the code. memset(p, 0, 16) tends to
get compiled into just two instructions. In contrast, a variable-length
memset tends to be several instructions to set up, plus a call
instruction, and the instructions inside memset() itself. scnprintf()
is also a few more instructions than snprintf().
So I'd say the old version is more "streamlined", actually. Granted,
the difference is probably only a few cycles, but it sounds like the
motivation for this patch is that you assumed the new version is faster?
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-29 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-29 21:23 [PATCH] ecryptfs: streamline offset formatting in ecryptfs_derive_iv Thorsten Blum
2026-03-29 22:05 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-03-30 0:59 ` Thorsten Blum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260329220505.GB2106@quark \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=code@tyhicks.com \
--cc=ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
--cc=zhangzipeng0@foxmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox