From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CD2C76196 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 02:57:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232934AbjDDC55 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2023 22:57:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53604 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229815AbjDDC54 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2023 22:57:56 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F70219BF; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 19:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FD55C00D0; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 22:57:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 03 Apr 2023 22:57:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tyhicks.com; h= cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1680577070; x=1680663470; bh=h6 jLTmnRVW7snfNMmkgCLHM59jUMA2sAlcMAGdnV2Xw=; b=MBIg+WLiErbILUNtQa S2T/3Hu+7s7AciF4vUlBsJCrOXevl/qXdAYvyINUHVIsPS96cjOZ06+FsarDzPxO BJaJTc51YGnlLnJBv80xiFtRDpfW5hWcEoq8aEF2p2RQMN1J1803VoMkItMhLOTK 0Ma73UFs0mRaKmeJTxdXg+q4NbAHpoVEdsX/vyvZP3beLqjmWaqufC0voZVKvOl5 14sKq3Jf+NIc/QmkZWdC4uF5940OW3w4NBRlbyyDJmChtrDQ+U46JHljbtu9U/Sc V/LJrfMRf3ASvgaZklOHb/50Ycr5HNgcLSbFC3T9AfhP2ptW4r+pN/gjNsSaqnwN ri2A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1680577070; x=1680663470; bh=h6jLTmnRVW7sn fNMmkgCLHM59jUMA2sAlcMAGdnV2Xw=; b=N/q4XmWRayOyGwwitHNVIU3hybttd T4kvZk7GWXCoNHPK995+hwrukRNqXtljw3xLvYA+H+adVwdvlNs7JVdv6qdulKNo 9TXB452tOfRLvdZgK4qFzJH4R7oefJmDmRq+LM1o7b72uyNpqC2AxAez6pp36cb2 DqnHvligJ+ByDK8mR5pVISgUrOWHnZ46/fxK4rYrRruK1c1AeV6ZQ6YWOKkL8xSJ BvvD//OKSyiY2PK/E55bcxJVoPg6MheBkE0dj6zCxI6GodC1NJPeOD66GJ+oBlco pHN8IRnJoUFbbjCBZNEbZ1swHHmXQnYt676qxaY9ur/UjIafBHMpUmlvA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdeikedggeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttd ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpedfvfihlhgvrhcujfhitghkshculdfoihgtrhhoshhofhht mddfuceotghouggvsehthihhihgtkhhsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehie eiueevgfetlefhjeekleeutddtudelveevhfekgefhhffhtedtffehuedvteenucevlhhu shhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegtohguvgesthihhh hitghkshdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i78e14604:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 22:57:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 21:57:48 -0500 From: "Tyler Hicks (Microsoft)" To: Yangtao Li Cc: brauner@kernel.org, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark ecryptfs as orphan state Message-ID: References: <20230403-frolic-constant-bc5d0fb13196@brauner> <20230403134432.46726-1-frank.li@vivo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230403134432.46726-1-frank.li@vivo.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org On 2023-04-03 21:44:32, Yangtao Li wrote: > > I can devote some time to limping it by until removal but would also > > appreciate a hand if anyone has time/interest. > > I have time and interest, if possible, I would like to be a reviewer > before ecryptfs is removed. Hi - I don't think an additional reviewer is going to be sufficient to get eCryptfs into a good state long term. There are fairly large design problems that need more attention. I'll send a patch to deprecate and mark for removal in 2025. I'll happily add you as a reviewer and appreciate your interest in helping. Tyler