From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: "Georg Schönberger" <gschoenberger@thomas-krenn.com>
Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: new fio release?
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 14:52:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1966329.flRkpdWWKZ@merkaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375438822.629.1381382622441.JavaMail.root@thomas-krenn.com>
Am Donnerstag, 10. Oktober 2013, 07:23:42 schrieb Georg Schönberger:
> Hi Martin and Fio Users,
Hi Georg!
> > > > Georg is currently packaging fio 2.1.2 for Ubuntu Precise, while
> > > > I did
> > > > 2.1.1 for Debian a while ago.
> > > >
> > > > I already started packaging 2.1.2 for Debian as well and I think
> > > > I was
> > > > almost finished with it but I had:
> > > >
> > > > ms@mango:~/lokal/Debian/fio> lintian -IE
> > > > fio_2.1.2-1_amd64.changes
> > > > W: fio: script-with-language-extension usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py
> > > > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fio2gnuplot.py
> > > > W: fio: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/genfio
> > > >
> > > > which as I looked are all fixed upstream already.
> > > >
> > > > Since it is difficult to rename a upstream file in debian
> > > > packaging
> > > > without repacking upstream tarball, I'd rather build next package
> > > > from a
> > > > fio release with these issues fixed.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Can you do a fio 2.1.3 release?
> > >
> > > Yeah, it's about that time anyway, and the short list of changes
> > > between
> > > 2.1.2 to now seems to indicate a decent point to do a new release.
> >
> > I made a 2.1.3 fio package last week. Sven Hoexter already reviewed
> > and
> > uploaded it, so it is available in Debian Unstable.
> >
> > I will consider a backport once this one enters testing.
> >
> > Thanks,
[…]
> Do I have to consider special conditions if I rebuild Fio 2.1.3 and later on
> 2.1.4 under Ubuntu Precise?
I don´t know. I never built a package for Ubuntu.
I suggest to just try it out :)
Ciao,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-10 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <500349838.110961.1380009378087.JavaMail.zimbra@teamix.de>
2013-09-24 7:59 ` new fio release? Martin Steigerwald
2013-09-24 14:41 ` Jens Axboe
2013-10-09 11:02 ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-10-09 15:33 ` Jens Axboe
2013-10-10 5:23 ` Georg Schönberger
2013-10-10 12:52 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2013-10-10 12:56 ` Martin Steigerwald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1966329.flRkpdWWKZ@merkaba \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gschoenberger@thomas-krenn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox