From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Erwan Velu <erwan@seanodes.com>
Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Help required to understand fio output
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:19:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081119131945.GD26308@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4924115E.6040701@seanodes.com>
On Wed, Nov 19 2008, Erwan Velu wrote:
> Here come a typical output I have using fio. I added some line numbers
> as an helper.
>
> 01: /dev/mydisk: (groupid=1, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=7433
> 02: write: io=79,112MiB, bw=72,774KiB/s, iops=740, runt=1139888msec
> 03: slat (usec): min=9, max=572, avg=21.22, stdev= 7.03
> 04: clat (msec): min=2, max=668, avg=86.43, stdev=24.47
> 05: bw (KiB/s) : min= 0, max=80749, per=100.06%, avg=72815.92,
> stdev=2318.78
> 06: cpu : usr=0.93%, sys=1.35%, ctx=722885, majf=0, minf=10031
> 07: IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%,
> >=64=100.0%
> 08: submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%,
> >=64=0.0%
> 09: complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%,
> >=64=0.0%
> 10: issued r/w: total=0/843855, short=0/0
> 11:
> 12: lat (msec): 4=0.01%, 10=0.03%, 20=0.38%, 50=6.53%, 100=64.24%
> 13: lat (msec): 250=28.79%, 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%
>
>
> I have some questions about the output.
>
> About Latencies:
> Line 4, clat is reported to be at 86ms as average but line 12 is is
> written that 100=64 250=29
> What's the meaning of "100=" ? Does it means "there were 64% of IOs
> completed between 100 & 249 ms ?"
> If yes, that's pretty surprising that while having 95% of my IOs that
> are completed in more than 100ms, the average is reported as 86.
> If "100=" means "IO between 50 and 99ms", thus output become pretty
> confusing.
The output could do with a bit of prettying up... It's explained in the
documentation, though, The 100=64.24% field means that 64.24% of the ios
completed within 50 and 99ms, as you indicate.
> About IO depths:
> In my config file I had set a depth to 64. Line 07 reports that 100% of
> my IOs where >=64... cool but is it also said that 0.6% were spent on <=64K
> Sounds to be a rounding effect but does this really means that some IOs
> where sent with a short depth ?
It's rounding, 0.1% indicates that it's over 0%. Since we build up the
queue in the beginning, this is usually the case.
> And then, how should I understan lines 8 & 9 that reports that 100% of
> IOs were completed with a depth=4... What happened ?
Same deal, 4 means 1-4 completions per io_getevents() call for your test
case. So any attempt to retrieve completed IO from the system resulted
in a return of 1-4 ios.
> Hope this questions aren't too stupid ;o)
Not at all, I'd appreciate constructive criticism on how to improve the
output.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-19 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-19 13:15 Help required to understand fio output Erwan Velu
2008-11-19 13:19 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2008-11-19 13:42 ` Erwan Velu
2008-11-19 13:43 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081119131945.GD26308@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=erwan@seanodes.com \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox