From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from [95.166.99.235] ([95.166.99.235]:33259 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932257AbZKDRlS (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:41:18 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:41:23 +0100 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: Add extra_buff_count flag Message-ID: <20091104174123.GG8742@kernel.dk> References: <66dfd3fe0911031633s5bef0621g99b4164c2dd174d9@mail.gmail.com> <20091104073525.GQ8742@kernel.dk> <66dfd3fe0911040912s377b8b0eqb81fa3cad3db2d2f@mail.gmail.com> <20091104172932.GD8742@kernel.dk> <66dfd3fe0911040939w7629a514l393e3a6360430b54@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <66dfd3fe0911040939w7629a514l393e3a6360430b54@mail.gmail.com> Sender: fio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: fio@vger.kernel.org To: Radha Ramachandran Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 04 2009, Radha Ramachandran wrote: > I would rather document it than add it by default in case it starts > hitting memory constraints because its allocating more memory buffers. Yes I agree, I usually don't like having one option implying changes for another either. > Also Iam having difficulty running verify_async/libaio engine/iodepth > and iodepth_batch_complete options together, I will look into it to > see whats causing the issue. OK, I saw some issues on what appears to be races on io_u->flags today, but I haven't investigated that yet. -- Jens Axboe