From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: "Ricardo M. Correia" <Ricardo.M.Correia@Sun.COM>
Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Verification failures with mixed read/write case
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:28:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100223092849.GP1025@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1266456009.19149.72.camel@cfslap.wizy.org>
On Thu, Feb 18 2010, Ricardo M. Correia wrote:
> (Please CC me in the reply, I'm not subscribed)
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been observing verification failures with the following
> configuration file:
>
> -----------
> [global]
> ioengine=libaio
> iodepth=30
> rw=randrw
> bs=512-128k
> direct=1
> rwmixcycle=40
> verify=sha256
> verify_async=8
>
> [/dev/sda2]
> --------------------
>
> This happens on both RHEL5.4 and Ubuntu 9.10.
>
> I was observing that with fio-1.36, but I just tried cloning fio from
> the git repo and I'm experiencing the same problem.
>
> Any ideas of what might be wrong?
>
> I found this email of a few months ago:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/fio/msg00205.html
>
> And I just verified that this patch is in my just-cloned git tree.
Mixed read-write workloads generally don't work well with verify. The
reason being that if you do verify && read, then fio will assume that
you want to verify previously written data. That should not happen for a
generated read as part of a mixed workload, I'll check what happens
here.
> Also, an unrelated issue is that fio complains about 'rwmixcycle' being
> deprecated but the man page doesn't specify what parameter I should be
> using instead.
The time based approach didn't work well for buffered writes, so it was
switched to an issue based count instead only. So you use
rwmixread/rwmixwrite to set the percentages.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-23 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-18 1:20 Verification failures with mixed read/write case Ricardo M. Correia
2010-02-18 1:35 ` Ricardo M. Correia
2010-02-23 9:28 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2010-02-23 9:36 ` Jens Axboe
2010-02-23 13:48 ` Ricardo M. Correia
2010-02-23 13:59 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100223092849.GP1025@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=Ricardo.M.Correia@Sun.COM \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox