From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58708 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751476Ab0F2Tct (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:32:49 -0400 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5TJWmjk013272 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:32:48 -0400 Received: from machine.usersys (dhcp-100-19-106.bos.redhat.com [10.16.19.106]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5TJWmmu016713 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:32:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:32:47 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal Subject: Have we changed number of fields in fio --minimal output Message-ID: <20100629193247.GA3819@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: fio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: fio@vger.kernel.org To: fio@vger.kernel.org Hi, I was running latest fio and noticed that number of fields in fio --minimal output have gone up from 69 to 77. A increase of 8 fields. Don't see any update in --minimal documentation. Is it regarding total latency thing? Thanks Vivek