From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:37306 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755427Ab3EATcB (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 May 2013 15:32:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 21:31:46 +0200 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: android ashmem patch [review request] Message-ID: <20130501193146.GK7800@kernel.dk> References: <372C7AE269BA5E4D92B1082F530ED4B85069DFC9@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <372C7AE269BA5E4D92B1082F530ED4B85069DFC9@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: fio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: fio@vger.kernel.org To: "Akers, Jason B" Cc: "'fio@vger.kernel.org'" On Tue, Apr 30 2013, Akers, Jason B wrote: > I wrapped the ashmem calls with the existing shm* function definitions. It's a little ugly, but makes for an easy patch touching only os/os-android.h. > > Tested on both arm and x86 android phones. Thanks, applied. Would be a smidgen better to add os/os-android.c and put the functions in there. It is a little much code to put in a header. -- Jens Axboe