From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Puthikorn Voravootivat <puthik@chromium.org>
Cc: FIO List <fio@vger.kernel.org>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix rand_seed mismatches in verify phase
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 10:15:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140205171528.GF27534@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391463077-14292-1-git-send-email-puthik@chromium.org>
On Mon, Feb 03 2014, Puthikorn Voravootivat wrote:
> In verify phase, the rand_seed generated on replay does not match
> the written rand_seed.
>
> Multiple problems are causing this:
> 1. In verify phase fio does not set io_u->rand_seed to compare with
> hdr->rand_seed
> 2. In randrw scenario, fio log is stored in red-black tree in "sorted by LBA"
> order. Thus, it is imposible to replay the written order, or rather
> generate the seeds again in the same order.
> 3. In write phase, the code currently will generate rand_seed, write data
> and log rand_seed. When queuedepth > 1, it's possible the writes complete
> in a different order than rand_seed was generated. Thus when replaying
> the log, the generated rand_seed might not match what was written.
> 4. verify_backlog option will start verification before all the data has been
> written and it make rand_seed replay code broken with current design.
>
> Proposed fixes:
> 1. Use of existing verify_state to generate verify header.
> (and assumes this was the original intention of verify_state). And also
> adds code to replay rand_seed in verify phase.
> 2. If verifysort option is not enabled, store the write log in a list instead
> of the red-black tree. Otherwise, don't attempt to verify the rand_seed
> in the header.
> 3. In write phase, generate rand_seed, log rand_seed, write data. I.e. log
> IO transactions in the order generated, not completed.
> 4. Don't verify rand_seed when verify_backlog is enabled.
Seems like a reasonable solution to it all. Thanks! I'll get this
applied.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-05 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-03 21:31 [PATCH] fix rand_seed mismatches in verify phase Puthikorn Voravootivat
2014-02-03 22:54 ` Grant Grundler
2014-02-04 18:54 ` Puthikorn Voravootivat
2014-02-04 19:21 ` Grant Grundler
2014-02-05 18:27 ` Jens Axboe
2014-02-05 18:31 ` Grant Grundler
2014-02-05 19:30 ` Jens Axboe
2014-02-05 21:31 ` Grant Grundler
2014-02-05 21:38 ` Jens Axboe
2014-02-04 18:56 ` Puthikorn Voravootivat
2014-02-05 17:15 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2014-02-05 18:16 ` Grant Grundler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140205171528.GF27534@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grundler@chromium.org \
--cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
--cc=puthik@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox