From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:39:49 -0700
From: 'Jens Axboe' <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: Fio 2.1.5 release upcoming
Message-ID: <20140211153949.GC19057@kernel.dk>
References: <20140206192135.GB3950@kernel.dk>
 <005001cf271b$807ed630$817c8290$@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <005001cf271b$807ed630$817c8290$@yahoo.com>
To: Paul Alcorn <paulliesworld@yahoo.com>
Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <fio@vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Feb 11 2014, Paul Alcorn wrote:
> One problem I have noticed in windows is that the sequential workloads
> (read/write) do not scale correctly with different thread counts. Sequential
> measurements do not work correctly at all. 

You have to be a little more precise than that, I'm not sure what you
mean. If you tell me "what you ran, what you expected, and what you
saw", then that might help us a bit.

-- 
Jens Axboe