From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org, Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] zbd: Avoid duplicating the code for calculating the number of sectors with data
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:51:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180928215133.35222-7-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180928215133.35222-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
Introduce a new function process_swd() to avoid that almost identical code
occurs in check_swd() and zbd_file_reset(). Change the #if 0 / #endif pair
in check_swd() into if (false) to make sure that the compiler verifies the
syntactical correctness of that code.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
---
zbd.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/zbd.c b/zbd.c
index 7728f71d25a5..8acda1f62f32 100644
--- a/zbd.c
+++ b/zbd.c
@@ -726,10 +726,14 @@ static bool zbd_dec_and_reset_write_cnt(const struct thread_data *td,
return write_cnt == 0;
}
-/* Check whether the value of zbd_info.sectors_with_data is correct. */
-static void zbd_check_swd(const struct fio_file *f)
+enum swd_action {
+ CHECK_SWD,
+ SET_SWD,
+};
+
+/* Calculate the number of sectors with data (swd) and perform action 'a' */
+static uint64_t zbd_process_swd(const struct fio_file *f, enum swd_action a)
{
-#if 0
struct fio_zone_info *zb, *ze, *z;
uint64_t swd = 0;
@@ -741,18 +745,49 @@ static void zbd_check_swd(const struct fio_file *f)
swd += z->wp - z->start;
}
pthread_mutex_lock(&f->zbd_info->mutex);
- assert(f->zbd_info->sectors_with_data == swd);
+ switch (a) {
+ case CHECK_SWD:
+ assert(f->zbd_info->sectors_with_data == swd);
+ break;
+ case SET_SWD:
+ f->zbd_info->sectors_with_data = swd;
+ break;
+ }
pthread_mutex_unlock(&f->zbd_info->mutex);
for (z = zb; z < ze; z++)
pthread_mutex_unlock(&z->mutex);
-#endif
+
+ return swd;
+}
+
+/*
+ * The swd check is useful for debugging but takes too much time to leave
+ * it enabled all the time. Hence it is disabled by default.
+ */
+static const bool enable_check_swd = false;
+
+/* Check whether the value of zbd_info.sectors_with_data is correct. */
+static void zbd_check_swd(const struct fio_file *f)
+{
+ if (!enable_check_swd)
+ return;
+
+ zbd_process_swd(f, CHECK_SWD);
+}
+
+static void zbd_init_swd(struct fio_file *f)
+{
+ uint64_t swd;
+
+ swd = zbd_process_swd(f, SET_SWD);
+ dprint(FD_ZBD, "%s(%s): swd = %" PRIu64 "\n", __func__, f->file_name,
+ swd);
}
void zbd_file_reset(struct thread_data *td, struct fio_file *f)
{
- struct fio_zone_info *zb, *ze, *z;
+ struct fio_zone_info *zb, *ze;
uint32_t zone_idx_e;
- uint64_t swd = 0;
if (!f->zbd_info)
return;
@@ -760,17 +795,7 @@ void zbd_file_reset(struct thread_data *td, struct fio_file *f)
zb = &f->zbd_info->zone_info[zbd_zone_idx(f, f->file_offset)];
zone_idx_e = zbd_zone_idx(f, f->file_offset + f->io_size);
ze = &f->zbd_info->zone_info[zone_idx_e];
- for (z = zb ; z < ze; z++) {
- pthread_mutex_lock(&z->mutex);
- swd += z->wp - z->start;
- }
- pthread_mutex_lock(&f->zbd_info->mutex);
- f->zbd_info->sectors_with_data = swd;
- pthread_mutex_unlock(&f->zbd_info->mutex);
- for (z = zb ; z < ze; z++)
- pthread_mutex_unlock(&z->mutex);
- dprint(FD_ZBD, "%s(%s): swd = %llu\n", __func__, f->file_name,
- (unsigned long long) swd);
+ zbd_init_swd(f);
/*
* If data verification is enabled reset the affected zones before
* writing any data to avoid that a zone reset has to be issued while
--
2.19.0.605.g01d371f741-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-28 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-28 21:51 [PATCH 0/6] Restore the check_swd() function in the ZBD code Bart Van Assche
2018-09-28 21:51 ` [PATCH 1/6] t/zbd/functions: Make fio_reset_count() return 0 if no resets occurred Bart Van Assche
2018-09-28 21:51 ` [PATCH 2/6] t/zbd/test-zbd-support: Ensure that an assertion failure causes this test to fail Bart Van Assche
2018-09-28 21:51 ` [PATCH 3/6] t/zbd/test-zbd-support: Set fio aux path and forbid file creation Bart Van Assche
2018-09-28 21:51 ` [PATCH 4/6] t/zbd/test-zbd-support: Report a test summary when finished Bart Van Assche
2018-09-28 21:51 ` [PATCH 5/6] zbd: Restore zbd_check_swd() Bart Van Assche
2018-09-28 21:51 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2018-09-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 0/6] Restore the check_swd() function in the ZBD code Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180928215133.35222-7-bvanassche@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox