Flexible I/O Tester development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@gmail.com>
Cc: "fio@vger.kernel.org" <fio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bluestop.org>,
	Tomohiro Kusumi <tkusumi@tuxera.com>
Subject: Re: Pending fio 3.0 release
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 13:46:46 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <336d0c1b-2382-1037-2eac-e34b78242340@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALjAwxizNpBTAWLR4eTixM0QfgLrkvEEJzWmi_88_k_KKp5dUg@mail.gmail.com>

On 08/07/2017 01:05 PM, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> On 7 August 2017 at 17:10, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>>
>> CC'ing a few key people here - I want to release fio 3.0 shortly, which
>> is why the last released jumped to 2.99. However, before doing so, I'd
>> like to ensure that we are uptodate on platforms. Rebecca, is Windows
>> currently building fine with current -git? I suspect it is, but would be
>> nice to know for sure.
>>
>> Any other important pending fixes that should go in before 3.0 is
>> released?
> 
> There are a few pull requests queued up over on
> https://github.com/axboe/fio/pulls (json+ patches, inflight overlap
> use after free fix, C++ ioengine changes, serialise overlap changes,
> sheepdog ioengine, change some output to debugging only etc.).

Just pulled that in, it's fine now that the more controversial bits
are out.

> Locally, I have an experimental libiscsi ioengine, support for
> verify_state when verifying a readwrite workload, some HOWTO
> reordering to improve the man page conversion and some initial
> investigations into invalidation on Windows. The only one I'd have
> loved to see go in is the libiscsi engine but it's kinda raw and needs
> fixing up and I don't know when I'll have time to finish it...

For new engines, I don't mind merging them early, as long as the people
behind them are motivated to bring them up to snuff. Up to you.

verify_state support for read/write sounds like something that would be
nice to have, but isn't a must for 3.0.

Anyway, I'll likely cut 3.0 next week, so there's still time for
whatever changes we need. But they have to be low risk at this point,
I'd hate to do a 3.0 that broke anything recent.

> With regard to Windows, it seems to at least be building
> (https://ci.appveyor.com/project/axboe/fio/build/1.0.245 ) and running
> basic workloads for me...

Ah yes, thanks!

-- 
Jens Axboe



  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-07 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-07 16:10 Pending fio 3.0 release Jens Axboe
2017-08-07 19:05 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2017-08-07 19:46   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-08-07 22:02     ` Jeff Furlong
2017-08-07 22:25       ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2017-08-07 23:09         ` Jeff Furlong
2017-08-07 23:16           ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2017-08-07 19:48 ` Rebecca Cran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=336d0c1b-2382-1037-2eac-e34b78242340@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rebecca@bluestop.org \
    --cc=sitsofe@gmail.com \
    --cc=tkusumi@tuxera.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox