From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Kurt <batlin@gmail.com>
Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CPU utilization reporting
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:34:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E68B668.30204@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F96F5D48-5D6F-4C99-800C-0DE4B93357E8@gmail.com>
On 2011-09-08 14:31, Kurt wrote:
> Hello FIO community
>
> I have been working with FIO for a month or so and have studied the source code quite a bit as well. I have run into an issue where my CPU utilization (sys/user) is actually higher than 100% and in some cases it is higher than 200%!!! When my actual cpu utilization is nowhere near that.
>
> These tests were performed on a
> Dell T610
> 1x E5520 @ 2.27GHz 4 core / 8 thread
> 6GB Ram
>
> Example:
>
> [global]
> direct=1
> ramp_time=15
> runtime=30
> loops=1
> sync=0
> filename=/dev/sdb
>
> [512_Seq_Read-256]
> rw=read
> bs=512
> rwmixread=100
> iodepth=256
> randrepeat=0
> ioengine=libaio
> name=512_Seq_Read-256
> numjobs=2
>
> 512_Seq_Read-256: (g=0): rw=read, bs=512-512/512-512, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=256
> 512_Seq_Read-256: (g=0): rw=read, bs=512-512/512-512, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=256
> fio 1.57
> Starting 2 threads
>
> 512_Seq_Read-256: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=25402
> read : io=2107.7MB, bw=71933KB/s, iops=143857 , runt= 30003msec
> slat (usec): min=1 , max=472 , avg= 3.73, stdev=11.11
> clat (usec): min=133 , max=9529 , avg=1774.29, stdev=867.16
> lat (usec): min=137 , max=9531 , avg=1778.35, stdev=868.14
> bw (KB/s) : min= 0, max=102671, per=9.42%, avg=13701.43, stdev=29175.35
> cpu : usr=135.37%, sys=132.84%, ctx=346431, majf=0, minf=302
> IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=151.0%
> submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
> complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1%
> issued r/w/d: total=4316167/0/0, short=0/0/0
> lat (usec): 250=0.39%, 500=6.15%, 750=9.10%, 1000=8.69%
> lat (msec): 2=29.94%, 4=44.97%, 10=0.76%
> 512_Seq_Read-256: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=25403
> read : io=2156.4MB, bw=73590KB/s, iops=147171 , runt= 30001msec
> slat (usec): min=1 , max=650 , avg= 3.69, stdev=11.05
> clat (usec): min=130 , max=10959 , avg=1734.38, stdev=860.90
> lat (usec): min=133 , max=10961 , avg=1738.34, stdev=861.86
> bw (KB/s) : min= 0, max=103101, per=49.60%, avg=72180.12, stdev=18747.47
> cpu : usr=135.38%, sys=132.85%, ctx=346416, majf=0, minf=217
> IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=149.7%
> submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
> complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.1%
> issued r/w/d: total=4415302/0/0, short=0/0/0
> lat (usec): 250=0.42%, 500=6.52%, 750=9.49%, 1000=9.03%
> lat (msec): 2=30.91%, 4=42.90%, 10=0.74%, 20=0.01%
>
> Run status group 0 (all jobs):
> READ: io=4263.7MB, aggrb=145518KB/s, minb=73659KB/s, maxb=75356KB/s, mint=30001msec, maxt=30003msec
>
> Disk stats (read/write):
> sdb: ios=3980775/0, merge=9097849/0, ticks=4798475/0, in_queue=4798485, util=99.98%
>
> As you see the CPU is 135% both usr and sys� do I need to divide by the number of processor threads (8)?
I suspect you didn't copy the job file correctly, as it has no mention
of 'thread' but you are indeed using threads and not processes. The
usr/sys are accumulated for all threads in a group, so that is why it
could in theory be nr_threads * 100% for both usr and sys time. So yes,
if you wish to inspect per-thread usage, divide by the number of jobs
that you are running. In your case that would be 2.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-08 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-08 12:31 CPU utilization reporting Kurt
2011-09-08 12:34 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E68B668.30204@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=batlin@gmail.com \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox