From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fio-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:46172 "EHLO
	merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754239Ab2DLRcr (ORCPT <rfc822;fio@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:32:47 -0400
Message-ID: <4F8711B6.90906@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:32:38 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Status
References: <4F86842E.4040201@kernel.dk> (sfid-20120412_094401_288068_F62C76AD) <201204121716.39727.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
In-Reply-To: <201204121716.39727.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: fio-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: fio@vger.kernel.org
To: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Cc: "fio@vger.kernel.org" <fio@vger.kernel.org>

On 2012-04-12 17:16, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2012 schrieb Jens Axboe:
>> Hi,
>=20
> Hi!
>=20
>> In case you didn't notice, fio-2.0.7 was tagged yesterday. After
>> tagging 2.0.7, I pulled in a few changes from the gfio branch
>> that you might like to know about.
>=20
> Regarding packaging fio.
>=20
> Do you think fio 2.0.7 is stable enough for packaging?
>=20
> If so, I=EF=BF=BDd schedule updating the Debian package to it.
>=20
> Initially you recommended to stick with 1.x.

Yes, you can package 2.x now, it's stable.

--=20
Jens Axboe