From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: "Georg Schönberger" <gschoenberger@thomas-krenn.com>
Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IO depth reported by Fio/blktrace/iowatcher
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 09:54:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506BEF3D.9020508@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <506BED4F.2010802@kernel.dk>
On 2012-10-03 09:46, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2012-10-03 09:02, Georg Schönberger wrote:
>> Good Morning,
>>
>> I have a short question about the used io depth reported by Fio/blktrace/iowatcher:
>> If I am starting a test:
>> # blktrace -d /dev/sde -o hdd &
>> # fio --rw=read --name=wd --bs=1024k --direct=1 --filename=/dev/sde --offset=0 --runtime=300 --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=4
>> [...]
>> IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
>> submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
>> complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
>> [...]
>> As seen above Fio is reporting 100% io depth 4. In contrast to that blktrace and iowatcher (cf. attached figure) revealing the following io depths (9 and 7):
>> # blkparse hdd.blktrace.8
>> [...]
>> CPU8 (hdd):
>> Reads Queued: 9072, 4644MiB Writes Queued: 0, 0KiB
>> Read Dispatches: 9070, 4643MiB Write Dispatches: 0, 0KiB
>> Reads Requeued: 0 Writes Requeued: 0
>> Reads Completed: 9072, 4644MiB Writes Completed: 0, 0KiB
>> Read Merges: 0, 0KiB Write Merges: 0, 0KiB
>> Read depth: 9
>> [...]
>> # iowatcher -t hdd.blktrace.8 -o wd.svg
>> (showing an io depth of 7)
>>
>> Where is this divergence concerning the io depths coming from? A short explanation would be great =)
>
> You are using a relatively large block size (1024k) and that is why.
> That will be broken into 512kb chunks usually, effectively almost
> doubling the queue depth seen on the device side.
>
> Fio reports the queue depth the way it sees it, on the submitting
> application side. That may or may not be identical to what the device
> sees. It could be higher, if the scheduler is throttling fio. Or it
> could be lower, as in this case.
BTW, this is also visible if you look at the blkparse output:
Reads Queued: 9072, 4644MiB
which gives you an average read IO size of ~524KB.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-03 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1873496499.213815.1349247144505.JavaMail.root@thomas-krenn.com>
2012-10-03 7:02 ` IO depth reported by Fio/blktrace/iowatcher Georg Schönberger
2012-10-03 7:46 ` Jens Axboe
2012-10-03 7:54 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506BEF3D.9020508@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gschoenberger@thomas-krenn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox