From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: "Robin P. Blanchard" <robin@coraid.com>
Cc: "fio@vger.kernel.org" <fio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: regression since 2.1.3 (solaris/zfs)
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 09:18:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53174E4C.90402@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AAC03F56-6145-4649-AA09-32AEF3452119@coraid.com>
On 2014-03-05 09:11, Robin P. Blanchard wrote:
>
> On Mar 3, 2014, at 10:25 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>
>> On 03/02/2014 07:59 AM, Robin P. Blanchard wrote:
>>> My config file has direct=0, which until 2.1.4 worked as expected.
>>> Things seem to regress since.
>>>
>>> I apologize in advance if this has already been reported. Please
>>> let me know what I can do to further help (truss/debug).
>>
>> This isn't a known issue, so thanks for reporting it. The easiest way to debug this is to git bisect it. Looks like you are running from the tar balls, but I assume you have git installed? I'm assuming fio-2.1.3 worked for you - if not, just replace fio-2.1.3 in the below with whatever latest version did work. If you do, the cheat sheet is something ala:
>>
>> $ git clone git://git.kernel.dk/fio
>> $ cd fio; make
>> $ git bisect start
>> $ git bisect good fio-2.1.3
>> $ git bisect bad fio-2.1.4
>>
>> This starts the bisect series, now do:
>>
>> $ make clean; make
>>
>> and re-run your direct=0 job file. If it worked, then you do
>>
>> $ git bisect good
>>
>> and if not, you do git bisect bad instead. This gets you a new point in the tree to test, so repeat the make clean; make and re-run the test.
>> Keep doing this good/bad iteration until fio tells you what commit broke the test for you. Then send those results here!
>>
>> --
>> Jens Axboe
>>
>
>
> Here�s where it started working again:
>
> # git bisect good
> Bisecting: 4 revisions left to test after this (roughly 2 steps)
> [3bb0a7b0fda9945973f799ab253c70d3cb0e5c8b] howto: Fix redundant entries
>
> Let me know how else I can help.
Please keep going until it tells you what the definitively bad commit
is. It'll end up spitting out that info, if you keep doing git bisect
good/bad on each test point. You need just ~2 more tests after this one.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-05 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-02 14:59 regression since 2.1.3 (solaris/zfs) Robin P. Blanchard
2014-03-03 15:25 ` Jens Axboe
2014-03-05 16:11 ` Robin P. Blanchard
2014-03-05 16:18 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2014-03-05 16:27 ` Robin P. Blanchard
2014-03-05 17:06 ` Jens Axboe
2014-03-05 20:39 ` Robin P. Blanchard
2014-03-05 21:05 ` Jens Axboe
2014-03-05 21:12 ` Robin P. Blanchard
2014-03-05 21:14 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53174E4C.90402@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin@coraid.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox