From: "Frank D'Arcy" <frank.darcy@s3group.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, fio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: using fio client on 64-bit machine with fio server on 32-bit machine
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:09:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53B14574.7050900@s3group.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53ADDBF6.5020701@kernel.dk>
Hi Jens,
thanks for getting back to me.
I've rebuilt with the latest but I still see problems with the numbers.
I do see one improvement,
the "% done" printed while the test is in progress now increases nicely
from 0% to 100%
whereas before it would jump around to seemingly random values between
0% to 100%
I wonder is it picking the wrong set of numbers to print in some cases.
eg. from a test with 2 jobs that runs for 23 seconds I faound the
following in normal output ...
when run standalone on a 32-bit VM I see this for a "rw=randread" job
> read : io=47106B, bw=2047B/s, iops=1023, runt= 23001msec
whereas when the same test is run from 64-bit client to 32-bit server I
see this for the same job
> trim: io=98789GB, bw=1000/s, iops=0, runt=98784247808000msec
so it says "trim" where it should say "read"
and for the 2nd job which is "rw=write"
when run standalone on a 32-bit VM I see this
> write: io=34502B, bw=1500B/s, iops=750, runt= 23001msec
whereas when the same test is run from 64-bit client to 32-bit server I
see this for the same job
> read : io=148185GB, bw=1500/s, iops=750, runt=98788542775296msec
so it says "read" where it should say "write"
In the same test run, the following results are identical when run both
ways ...
>
> Run status group 0 (all jobs):
> READ: io=46KB, aggrb=1KB/s, minb=1KB/s, maxb=1KB/s, mint=23001msec,
> maxt=23001msec
> WRITE: io=33KB, aggrb=1KB/s, minb=1KB/s, maxb=1KB/s, mint=23001msec,
> maxt=23001msec
so these results look correct.
All the above problems are only seen when run from 64-bit client to
32-bit server,
no problems seen when running standalone,
and no problems seen when running 64-bit client to 64-bit server.
Thanks,
Frank
On 27/06/2014 22:02, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 06/27/2014 10:47 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2014-06-27 01:00, Frank D'Arcy wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I've been playing around with fio (which is really great thanks)
>>> with a view to testing hard disks on set-top boxes (which I don't have
>>> yet)
>>> and as prep for this I created a test environment consisting of
>>> 2 x virtual machines running 32-bit ubuntu (using "hashicorp/precise32"
>>> from vagrant cloud)
>>> running on a 64-bit machine with ubuntu 12.04.
>>>
>>> I started fio (v2.1.10) running in server mode on both virtual machines
>>> as follows
>>> $ fio --server=,8880
>>>
>>> and launched 2 fio (v2.1.10) instances in client mode on the host 64-bit
>>> machine,
>>> $ fio --client=ip:127.0.0.1,8882 test.fio
>>> $ fio --client=ip:127.0.0.1,8881 test.fio
>>> where ports 8881 and 8882 are forwarded to port 8880 on each VM
>>>
>>> The sample test.fio (below) runs for 25 seconds
>>> but the values printed by the clients look garbled.
>>> eg. runtime is a huge number ("runt= 107374182400000msec")
>>>
>>> Same issue is seen when I switched to using latest fio from "git clone"
>>> and the same issue is seen with all output formats (json, terse, normal)
>>>
>>> I changed one of the virtual machines to 64-bit ubuntu (using
>>> "hashicorp/precise64" from vagrant cloud)
>>> and the client talking to the fio server on that VM gave the correct
>>> results (eg. "runt= 25001msec")
>>> while the client talking to the 32-bit ubuntu VM continued to show
>>> garbled values.
>>>
>>> So it looks like support is not there for client-server setups on
>>> non-matching architectures ?
>>> eg. 32-bit client to 64-bit server in this case,
>>> and perhaps endianess differences would be a problem too? ( but I
>>> haven't tried that )
>>>
>>> Apologies if I've missed this issue raised elsewhere, I did a quick
>>> search and found no mention of it.
>>> It's not critical for us, as the simple workaround is to run fio
>>> standalone on each set-top box
>>> outputting results to a file and pulling the file back to a central
>>> machine for parsing.
>>> Just wanted to raise it if its unknown to you.
>> Any mix of 32 vs 64-bit and big vs little endian should work, all the
>> data structures are sanitized across the wire. So if it doesn't work,
>> then that is surely a bug! I'll take a look at this.
> http://git.kernel.dk/?p=fio.git;a=commit;h=819db5f5009742975cfdd036440522bd45b86fe7
>
> this should make it behave better. Let me know if there are still issues
> with 32 vs 64 bit client/server.
>
--
Frank D'Arcy
www.s3group.com
-----
The information contained in this e-mail and in any attachments is confidential and is designated solely for the attention of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this e-mail or any part thereof. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all copies of this e-mail from your computer system(s). Please direct any additional queries to: communications@s3group.com. Thank You. Silicon and Software Systems Limited (S3 Group). Registered in Ireland no. 378073. Registered Office: South County Business Park, Leopardstown, Dublin 18.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-30 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-27 7:00 using fio client on 64-bit machine with fio server on 32-bit machine Frank D'Arcy
2014-06-27 16:47 ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-27 21:02 ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-30 11:09 ` Frank D'Arcy [this message]
2014-06-30 14:52 ` Jens Axboe
2014-06-30 17:06 ` Frank D'Arcy
2014-07-01 2:23 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53B14574.7050900@s3group.com \
--to=frank.darcy@s3group.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox