From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <54354B49.8040307@kernel.dk> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 08:33:45 -0600 From: Jens Axboe MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: FIO - Client and Server - Suggestion References: <54345B52.7060306@kernel.dk> <543462BE.3000101@kernel.dk> <54346A66.6000509@kernel.dk> <40C9565A-0AB9-413A-B342-F5EF247686E5@netapp.com> <54349A4E.3080207@kernel.dk> <5434B79F.4030700@kernel.dk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues" Cc: "fio@vger.kernel.org" List-ID: On 10/08/2014 08:13 AM, Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues wrote: > > > On 10/8/14, 12:03 AM, "Jens Axboe" wrote: > >> On 2014-10-07 21:24, Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues wrote: >>> Nossa Senhora:fio neto$ ./fio --client 10.61.109.151 --remote-config >>> /root/fio.patch/fio/model >>> hostname=s1, be=0, 64-bit, os=Linux, arch=x86-64, >>> fio=fio-2.1.13-42-g3232, >>> flags=1 >>> fio: unable to open '/root/fio.patch/fio/model:70?' job file >>> client: host=10.61.109.151 disconnected >>> >>> Any ideas? >> >> Looks like I just forgot to zero terminate that string. It was never >> absolute or relative path, just luck and what was in memory. Try and >> pull again, I committed a fix for that. >> >> -- >> Jens Axboe >> >> -- > > > Hi Jens, > > This is neto from Brazil > > How are you? > > Seems to me it's working with absolute path now with the latest commit to > remote-config branch. Great, I verified this morning that it was an issue, we'd be looking at unitialized/allocated memory without it. > But, running the workload from my mac (connected to 2 Linux clients) I do > not see the progress. > > Nossa Senhora:fiop neto$ ./fio --client 10.61.109.151 --remote-config > /root/fiop/model --client 10.61.109.152 --remote-config /root/fiop/model > hostname=s2, be=0, 64-bit, os=Linux, arch=x86-64, fio=fio-2.1.13, flags=1 > hostname=s1, be=0, 64-bit, os=Linux, arch=x86-64, fio=fio-2.1.13-31-g15e3, > flags=1 > workload: (g=0): rw=read, workload: (g=0): rw=read, > bs=64K-64K/64K-64K/64K-64K, bs=64K-64K/64K-64K/64K-64K, ioengine=libaio, > iodepth=1 > ioengine=libaio, iodepth=1 > ... > ... > Starting Starting 128 threads > 128 threads > Jobs: 0 (f=0) > > Any idea why? Works for me, just tried it from an OSX client. I notice that you don't seem to have updated the 's2' fio version, however. So I'd suggest you ensure you are running the same thing on all of them. -- Jens Axboe