Re: competime_assert failure without -O3 optimization flag expected ?

[Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>]

On 06/29/2015 09:55 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 06/29/2015 09:53 AM, Alireza Haghdoost wrote:
>> Sure, I will investigate it. Just want to confirm the issue is in the
>> compiletime_assert() code as you mentioned and it is not in that line
>> of code that I cite in my last email. I managed to remedy this issue a
>> little bit by using -O1 instead of -O3 but still the optimized program
>> order is not exactly similar to the default source code order.
>
> It bothers me too, I'll turn off optimizations for debugging things too,
> and just end up uncommenting the lines to make that work. Apparently it
> hasn't bothered me enough to fix it up yet, but I would love to see it
> fixed.

BTW, the issue is basically that without optimizations, gcc doesn't 
realize that the declared extern function doesn't get called. So asserts 
fail, doesn't matter if they are true or false.

-- 
Jens Axboe