From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix iodepth_batch=0
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:40:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57506FA2.9030704@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160602173134.GA9588@vader.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
On 06/02/2016 11:31 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:45:49AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 06/01/2016 01:04 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
>>> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
>>>
>>> The man page claims that iodepth_batch=0 falls back to whatever was
>>> specified for iodepth, but the enforced minimum of 1 means that 0 is not
>>> actually valid.
>>>
>>> Fixes: a2e6f8ac56a9 ("Make iodepth_batch=1 by default")
>>> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
>>
>> Probably a better idea to just adjust the check-and-set instead, ala the
>> below:
>>
>> diff --git a/init.c b/init.c
>> index 7166ea766d8a..e82446ba6f2a 100644
>> --- a/init.c
>> +++ b/init.c
>> @@ -695,7 +695,8 @@ static int fixup_options(struct thread_data *td)
>> /*
>> * If batch number isn't set, default to the same as iodepth
>> */
>> - if (o->iodepth_batch > o->iodepth || !o->iodepth_batch)
>> + if (o->iodepth_batch > o->iodepth ||
>> + !fio_option_is_set(o, iodepth_batch))
>> o->iodepth_batch = o->iodepth;
>>
>> /*
>
> I wasn't trying to change the default (which is currently 1), just trying to
> fix the discrepancy between the man page:
>
> iodepth_batch=int, iodepth_batch_submit=int
> This defines how many pieces of IO to submit at once. It defaults to 1
> which means that we submit each IO as soon as it is available, but can
> be raised to submit bigger batches of IO at the time. If it is set to 0
> the iodepth value will be used.
>
> and the actual behavior:
>
> # ./fio --name=test --filename=/dev/nullb0 --direct=1 --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=8 --iodepth_batch=0 --runtime=1 --time_based
> min value out of range: 0 (1 min)
> fio: failed parsing iodepth_batch=0
Ah gotcha, I think your patch will do nicely for that, and re-instate
the documented behavior. Added, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-02 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-01 7:04 [PATCH] Fix iodepth_batch=0 Omar Sandoval
2016-06-02 15:45 ` Jens Axboe
2016-06-02 17:31 ` Omar Sandoval
2016-06-02 17:40 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57506FA2.9030704@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox