From: zhong <zhong@imap.linux.ibm.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, fio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] powerpc: enable cpu clock for powerpc64
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 15:21:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc73b2eb8cae04be0634d3ecee0df064@imap.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5661CC63.7070305@kernel.dk>
On 2015-12-05 01:24, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/03/2015 10:50 PM, Li Zhong wrote:
>> This patch tries to enable cpu clock for powerpc64, the code is copied
>> from
>> mftb() in kernel source.
>>
>> The two instructions after mfspr are added in the kernel to solve an
>> erratum on
>> Cell and fsl booke CPUs. On those CPUs, 64 bits mftb is not atomic, so
>> it is
>> possible that the low order 32 bits are already reset to 0x00000000
>> but the
>> high order bits are not yet incremented by one.
>>
>> Don't know how to tell whether it will be running on those CPUs or
>> not, I just
>> keep the above fix for all ppc64 CPUs. Even if we have some method to
>> check
>> whether we are on those CPUs or not at run time, I think the check
>> won't cost
>> less than the two added instructions. Maybe we could use the similar
>> fix up
>> code kernel uses to dynamically patch the instructions with nops if
>> not needed.
>> But that would add much more complexity.
>
> Thanks, applied. I don't have any powerpc hw, so I'll depend on your
> testing for this.
Thank you. We did compile and run it on a P8 host/guest, it seemed ok.
Thanks, Zhong
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-07 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-04 5:50 [RFC PATCH] powerpc: enable cpu clock for powerpc64 Li Zhong
2015-12-04 17:24 ` Jens Axboe
2015-12-07 7:21 ` zhong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dc73b2eb8cae04be0634d3ecee0df064@imap.linux.ibm.com \
--to=zhong@imap.linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox