From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] filter: fix assumed whitespace in _filefrag_filter regex
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:38:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02910403-e6c2-5af8-ebe6-c7fe19b7c02a@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190121225155.GG4205@dastard>
On 1/21/19 5:51 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 11:33:11AM -0500, jeffm@suse.com wrote:
>> From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
>>
>> The regex assumes there will be whitespace after the .. in the ranges
>> and, with larger offsets, there may not be any.
>
> Does more than this, right?
I suppose. It converts the interpreted .. into a literal .., which I
believe was the original intent.
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
>> ---
>> common/filter | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/filter b/common/filter
>> index ed082d24..b4443a34 100644
>> --- a/common/filter
>> +++ b/common/filter
>> @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ _filter_filefrag()
>> next
>> }
>> ($ext, $logical, $physical, $length) =
>> - (/^\s*(\d+):\s+(\d+)..\s+\d+:\s+(\d+)..\s+\d+:\s+(\d+):/)
>> + (/^\s*(\d+):\s+(\d+)\.\.\s*\d+:\s+(\d+)\.\.\s*\d+:\s+(\d+):/)
>
> This is escaping "..", too, isn't it?
Yes, but what else could the .. in the original regex have been
referring to? I don't recall seeing any other filefrag format that
would match otherwise.
I don't have a problem documenting it further, though.
-Jeff
--
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-23 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-21 16:33 [PATCH 1/7] btrfs/010: don't run without /sys/fs/btrfs jeffm
2019-01-21 16:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] filter: fix assumed whitespace in _filefrag_filter regex jeffm
2019-01-21 22:51 ` Dave Chinner
2019-01-23 1:38 ` Jeff Mahoney [this message]
2019-01-23 4:16 ` Dave Chinner
2019-01-21 16:33 ` [PATCH 3/7] filter: add support for old filefrag -v jeffm
2019-01-21 22:53 ` Dave Chinner
2019-01-23 1:38 ` Jeff Mahoney
2019-01-21 16:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] btrfs: require feature raid56 for raid56 tests jeffm
2019-01-22 22:39 ` Filipe Manana
2019-01-21 16:33 ` [PATCH 5/7] btrfs/023: skip trying to test raid56 without kernel support jeffm
2019-01-22 22:40 ` Filipe Manana
2019-01-21 16:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] btrfs/131: require support for free-space-tree jeffm
2019-01-22 22:41 ` Filipe Manana
2019-01-21 16:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] check: move test exclusion handling to _prepare_test_list jeffm
2019-01-21 23:09 ` Dave Chinner
2019-01-23 1:59 ` Jeff Mahoney
2019-01-22 22:38 ` [PATCH 1/7] btrfs/010: don't run without /sys/fs/btrfs Filipe Manana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02910403-e6c2-5af8-ebe6-c7fe19b7c02a@suse.com \
--to=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox