From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 173583AC01; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 14:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b="r6zgnUyw"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b="2j6W/8fY"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b="r6zgnUyw"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b="2j6W/8fY" Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20A2A21F49; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 14:05:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704981937; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dnnpKqbQulcezH1sSqC8YGoJTprF9iSRIFkHOMZEhsQ=; b=r6zgnUywKzK8kVF/WLdXjJTjXrmUmJCVQtezxFm20Pi64udJu0uUzDlM9b05hCISrgViKI EIfgLfAe/gabN43bZ9dQAbl6K3wjwlVebsLt20KrYcrQDsIfNHpIoCbYo4Va+W5YANbw4N pQaXSKnI8cjcCJkLE937/LccDKG5Nic= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704981937; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dnnpKqbQulcezH1sSqC8YGoJTprF9iSRIFkHOMZEhsQ=; b=2j6W/8fY8roa5n6UTWHr+PBk+oMv3EfSjNGmJXlN3FGs982SuLi1Mu7RNDhVLz9FIF5Re8 L2txLcOzxxFTKaBg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704981937; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dnnpKqbQulcezH1sSqC8YGoJTprF9iSRIFkHOMZEhsQ=; b=r6zgnUywKzK8kVF/WLdXjJTjXrmUmJCVQtezxFm20Pi64udJu0uUzDlM9b05hCISrgViKI EIfgLfAe/gabN43bZ9dQAbl6K3wjwlVebsLt20KrYcrQDsIfNHpIoCbYo4Va+W5YANbw4N pQaXSKnI8cjcCJkLE937/LccDKG5Nic= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704981937; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dnnpKqbQulcezH1sSqC8YGoJTprF9iSRIFkHOMZEhsQ=; b=2j6W/8fY8roa5n6UTWHr+PBk+oMv3EfSjNGmJXlN3FGs982SuLi1Mu7RNDhVLz9FIF5Re8 L2txLcOzxxFTKaBg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BA1913635; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 14:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 5pu6ArH1n2WuOQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 11 Jan 2024 14:05:37 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:05:36 +0100 From: pvorel To: Cyril Hrubis , Li Wang , Jan Stancek , Xiao Yang , Yang Xu Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, Kent Overstreet , Brian Foster , linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org, Amir Goldstein , Jan Kara Subject: ENODEV on bcachefs on kernel < 6.7 [was: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add support bcachefs filesystem] In-Reply-To: References: <20231207194011.273027-1-pvorel@suse.cz> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail Message-ID: <067cf38108dd5b088168628d569f79c1@suse.de> X-Sender: pvorel@suse.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=r6zgnUyw; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b="2j6W/8fY" X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.29 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[suse.de:dkim]; BAYES_HAM(-2.99)[99.95%]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.de:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWELVE(0.00)[12]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.de:dkim]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[lists.linux.it,linux.dev,redhat.com,vger.kernel.org,gmail.com,suse.cz]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 20A2A21F49 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Score: -5.29 X-Spam-Flag: NO Hi all, I'm sorry I haven't tested LTP with bcachefs-tools and kernel < 6.7. Quite a lot of tests fails: # LTP_SINGLE_FS_TYPE=bcachefs ./chdir01 tst_buffers.c:56: TINFO: Test is using guarded buffers tst_device.c:96: TINFO: Found free device 0 '/dev/loop0' tst_test.c:1709: TINFO: LTP version: 20230929-269-g958402a95 tst_test.c:1593: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 00m 30s tst_supported_fs_types.c:151: TINFO: WARNING: testing only bcachefs tst_supported_fs_types.c:122: TINFO: FUSE does support bcachefs tst_supported_fs_types.c:57: TINFO: mkfs.bcachefs does exist tst_test.c:1669: TINFO: === Testing on bcachefs === tst_test.c:1117: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with bcachefs opts='' extra opts='' tst_test.c:1131: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop0 to /tmp/LTP_chdwqhGtZ/mntpoint fstyp=bcachefs flags=0 tst_test.c:1131: TBROK: mount(/dev/loop0, mntpoint, bcachefs, 0, (nil)) failed: ENODEV (19) Library fails on safe_mount(). I wonder if we should check for kernel >= 6.7 in case of bcachefs, or if we should return 0 in safe_mount() in case of bcachefs and errno == ENODEV (and possibly kernel < 6.7). Kind regards, Petr