From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1E1E1B86F7 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 12:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737376356; cv=none; b=AdeDnKRqCFFGJP5GsZ6kFegM6PBo76PhHDw//aszTbo4N40UtJJiwgMamSIbTR29TCnHa2/4luqa7STzS9CF2GVsCbtlNPbZ1v+dOZAIDW3U78ACFZgZBKNBmSxH4tSVRmaCbS1g+rgyopmDU0lMzIevzCU2D9QKI6isl8bjSPw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737376356; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+LwCxqVRPS+wr+2Tv84R2MAyCpcbym4LbR2Ue/sGWOk=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-ID; b=QnlKKTKW8EYapU7gPjAJLSGMwH+ituDjuJlWUDsA+qP7edLkx1j+IsRyoCSlYsSBStNTGVy9Ossfu86gBUsakuRK+367Z2xpqCbqFMPqpjcKtvAjW54U/4ndOG10iMD162bTjGzls10YO/iyH9QATg7dXtWqIGGx+BgxLgXS3xU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=E+TwPsFM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="E+TwPsFM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1737376353; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=opcTe4i6eDAWBVL9dz77gDa+ZjIgR8GU9Qdfcu40y4s=; b=E+TwPsFMq8g5cvPejW8zO0NWdz+gTnBK3zKqiWlVIf7dTtDn89BG1Fsi7zDoFjVyE1AlVX E5JKIbVBAG8zDnmJP/6Myzm9OXV9WTjgNVWJJfVKnjgGz8waZGYM+y/+OsrRVzQKFE/qUa m8GbIJjdbrGeAb6n049QZXrbfD/v3N0= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-612-OqGN2ih8O6a1pGYi9oKy9A-1; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 07:32:32 -0500 X-MC-Unique: OqGN2ih8O6a1pGYi9oKy9A-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: OqGN2ih8O6a1pGYi9oKy9A Received: from mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE62719560B0; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 12:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.42.28.5]) by mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9972A19560BF; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 12:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells To: Eric Biggers cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Alex Markuze , fstests@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Error in generic/397 test script? Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1113698.1737376348.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 12:32:28 +0000 Message-ID: <1113699.1737376348@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.40 Hi Eric, In the generic/397 test script, you placed: $XFS_IO_PROG -f $SCRATCH_MNT/edir/newfile |& _filter_scratch $XFS_IO_PROG -f $SCRATCH_MNT/edir/0123456789abcdef |& _filter_scratch but neither of those lines actually has a command on it, and when I run it, I'm seeing xfs_io hang just waiting endlessly for someone to type commands on stdin. Would it be better to do: echo >$SCRATCH_MNT/edir/newfile |& _filter_scratch echo >$SCRATCH_MNT/edir/0123456789abcdef |& _filter_scratch instead? David?