From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 805951E9B18 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 17:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737394910; cv=none; b=k9vkYAyy4wgxcmrJn9MJIV8O8BcRIL4VeYEiqxZ0DIT7t48Jl6th4BqoSxS1NrF4AVdUR7M62xoMT+mOZOkANbzRzFELnmAEwKqjdjbUvCcpSwOZg6Xd+UpJBCuj0cLUV33tdpQ34V4gN1yf1Vdlm5nkNKd+ndqUR3IqmXLyAsY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737394910; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RfwqfJ6WQFvFiurvX7OLUSqD6sAC/uLfdBok+sVje58=; h=From:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date:Message-ID; b=Jxq2BTWdLpiMEIgaMEM2nZV99QlKTM7mGk/ViuF63+TWz3miBJERthTiJTvW3X+LJEtx16AqMpeQpXZ2TNawsiRl2nwyYtQoqaMHvocdMFLqyaBtUqJRm9K34uzexUHkYW69tS5PKFxdY/hy9z3hkynv68/T60cbxpCnhXWEjb0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=V9LdAlZO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="V9LdAlZO" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1737394907; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SpxnSlISiNchvWWX6LnEHPhu33sba9G29IFfuhf9BNM=; b=V9LdAlZO8ZggT4q9fNpSX52Eg+LQfpc2YTbQfjJYof3APaSg9Y/ytJyGPiTsSUfvfvSv3a nTAMPdVM55yHlVukwVUGZg8WtOW6M5MTqMtSND1cdYToQGzK4h8IOvUAjry2N9cmRFKE9v 6znQIBRG7q2h9vHY912G0ayseFHmYA4= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-114-E_Bkld3aMdefOaFDLZKDhQ-1; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 12:41:44 -0500 X-MC-Unique: E_Bkld3aMdefOaFDLZKDhQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: E_Bkld3aMdefOaFDLZKDhQ Received: from mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 289B1195604F; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 17:41:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.42.28.5]) by mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C268B19560AD; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 17:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20250120172542.GC1159@sol.localdomain> References: <20250120172542.GC1159@sol.localdomain> <1201003.1737382806@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1113699.1737376348@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1207325.1737387826@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Eric Biggers Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Alex Markuze , fstests@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Error in generic/397 test script? Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1211246.1737394900.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 17:41:40 +0000 Message-ID: <1211247.1737394900@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.40 Eric Biggers wrote: > It would be enlightening to understand what the issue was here. Did you > explicitly disable these options, overriding the imply, without providing a > replacement? Or was this another issue specific to unmerged kernel patches? I enabled CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION in addition to the options I normally use, but didn't realise I needed to enable CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS as well. David