public inbox for fstests@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fdmanana@kernel.org
To: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] fstests: fix btrfs test failures after commit 27d077ec0bda
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:22:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452518547-4109-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@kernel.org> (raw)

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

Commit 27d077ec0bda (common: use mount/umount helpers everywhere) made
a few btrfs tests fail (btrfs/003 and btrfs/011). These tests create
filesystems with multiple devices and test the device replace feature,
which need to unmount using the mount path ($SCRATCH_MNT) because
unmounting using one of the devices as an argument ($SCRATCH_DEV) does
not always work - after replace operations we get in /proc/mounts a
device other than $SCRATCH_DEV associated with the mount point
$SCRATCH_MNT (this is mentioned in a comment at btrfs/011 for example),
so we need to pass that other device to the umount program or pass it the
mount point.
Fix this by making _sctatch_unmount() pass $SCRATCH_MNT to umount instead
of $SCRATCH_DEV (when the filesystem being tested is btrfs).

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
---

V2: Change _sctatch_unmount() to pass $SCRATCH_MNT as the argument to the
    umount program instead of $SCRATCH_DEV. This makes the btrfs tests
    pass again.

V3: Pass $SCRATCH_MNT to the umount program instead of $SCRATCH_DEV only
    if the filesystem being tested is btrfs. This was making generic/050
    fail (which I couldn't test using btrfs because btrfs does not have
    the shutdown feature unlike xfs for e.g.).

 common/rc | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
index 5135260..cbf1854 100644
--- a/common/rc
+++ b/common/rc
@@ -316,11 +316,17 @@ _scratch_mount()
 
 _scratch_unmount()
 {
-	if [ "$FSTYP" == "overlay" ]; then
+	case "$FSTYP" in
+	overlay)
 		_overlay_scratch_unmount
-	else
+		;;
+	btrfs)
+		$UMOUNT_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT
+		;;
+	*)
 		$UMOUNT_PROG $SCRATCH_DEV
-	fi
+		;;
+	esac
 }
 
 _scratch_remount()
-- 
2.1.3


                 reply	other threads:[~2016-01-11 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1452518547-4109-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox