From: Xiong Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>
To: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Xiong Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] generic: add OFD lock tests
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 16:30:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1508401836-5114-1-git-send-email-xzhou@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171016102849.GA10593@eguan.usersys.redhat.com>
The basic idea is placing a type of lock in one process,
eg WRLCK, on a testfile in SCRATCH_MNT, then do fcntl
getlk with a type of lock, eg RDLCK, in another process.
In the end, we check the returned flock.l_type by getlk
to see if the lock mechanism works fine.
We can also test these situations:
that the two locks are conflicting or not;
that open testfile RDONLY or RDWR.
Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>
---
v3:
Use golden output to match test result;
Use semaphore to sync getlk/setlk;
Add option parse to the test programme;
Add a testrun code path for the helper;
Add more comments;
Skip the not stable /proc/locks check.
.gitignore | 1 +
common/rc | 11 +++
src/Makefile | 3 +-
src/t_ofd_locks.c | 262 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/generic/466 | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/generic/466.out | 13 +++
tests/generic/group | 1 +
7 files changed, 409 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 src/t_ofd_locks.c
create mode 100755 tests/generic/466
create mode 100644 tests/generic/466.out
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 2014c08..77acb42 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@
/src/t_mmap_write_ro
/src/t_mmap_writev
/src/t_mtab
+/src/t_ofd_locks
/src/t_readdir_1
/src/t_readdir_2
/src/t_rename_overwrite
diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
index e2a8229..983a214 100644
--- a/common/rc
+++ b/common/rc
@@ -3192,6 +3192,17 @@ _require_test_fcntl_advisory_locks()
_notrun "Require fcntl advisory locks support"
}
+_require_ofd_locks()
+{
+ # Give a test run by setlk/getlk rdlck on testfile.
+ # If the running kernel does not support OFD locks,
+ # EINVAL will be returned.
+ touch $TEST_DIR/ofd_testfile || \
+ _notrun "Something wrong with $TEST_DIR"
+ src/t_ofd_locks -t $TEST_DIR/ofd_testfile > /dev/null 2>&1
+ [ $? -eq 22 ] && _notrun "Require OFD locks support"
+}
+
_require_test_lsattr()
{
testio=$(lsattr -d $TEST_DIR 2>&1)
diff --git a/src/Makefile b/src/Makefile
index 3eb25b1..f37af74 100644
--- a/src/Makefile
+++ b/src/Makefile
@@ -13,7 +13,8 @@ TARGETS = dirstress fill fill2 getpagesize holes lstat64 \
multi_open_unlink dmiperf unwritten_sync genhashnames t_holes \
t_mmap_writev t_truncate_cmtime dirhash_collide t_rename_overwrite \
holetest t_truncate_self t_mmap_dio af_unix t_mmap_stale_pmd \
- t_mmap_cow_race t_mmap_fallocate fsync-err t_mmap_write_ro
+ t_mmap_cow_race t_mmap_fallocate fsync-err t_mmap_write_ro \
+ t_ofd_locks
LINUX_TARGETS = xfsctl bstat t_mtab getdevicesize preallo_rw_pattern_reader \
preallo_rw_pattern_writer ftrunc trunc fs_perms testx looptest \
diff --git a/src/t_ofd_locks.c b/src/t_ofd_locks.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f87c9c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/t_ofd_locks.c
@@ -0,0 +1,262 @@
+#ifndef _GNU_SOURCE
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#endif
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <sys/stat.h>
+#include <sys/types.h>
+#include <sys/ipc.h>
+#include <sys/sem.h>
+
+/*
+ * In distributions that do not have these macros ready in
+ * glibc-headers, compilation fails. Adding them here to avoid
+ * build errors, relevant tests would fail at the helper which
+ * requires OFD locks support and notrun if the kernel does not
+ * support OFD locks. If the kernel does support OFD locks,
+ * we are good to go.
+ *
+ */
+#ifndef F_OFD_GETLK
+#define F_OFD_GETLK 36
+#endif
+
+#ifndef F_OFD_SETLK
+#define F_OFD_SETLK 37
+#endif
+
+#ifndef F_OFD_SETLKW
+#define F_OFD_SETLKW 38
+#endif
+
+/* This is required by semctl to set semaphore value */
+union semun {
+ int val; /* Value for SETVAL */
+ struct semid_ds *buf; /* Buffer for IPC_STAT, IPC_SET */
+ unsigned short *array; /* Array for GETALL, SETALL */
+ struct seminfo *__buf; /* Buffer for IPC_INFO
+ (Linux-specific) */
+};
+
+int fd;
+
+void err_exit(char *op, int errn)
+{
+ fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s\n", op, strerror(errn));
+ if (fd > 0)
+ close(fd);
+ exit(errn);
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ /* Five flags that used to specify operation details.
+ * They can be specified via command line options.
+ *
+ * option: -s/-g
+ * lock_cmd : 1 <--> setlk
+ * 0 <--> getlk
+ *
+ * option: -r/-w
+ * lock_rw : 1 <--> set/get wrlck
+ * 0 <--> set/get rdlck
+ *
+ * option: -o num
+ * lock_start : l_start to getlk
+ *
+ * option: -R/-W
+ * open_rw : 1 <--> open file RDWR
+ * 0 <--> open file RDONLY
+ *
+ * This option is for _require_ofd_locks helper, just do
+ * fcntl setlk then return errno.
+ * option: -t
+ * testrun : 1 <--> this is a testrun, return after setlk
+ * 0 <--> this is not a testrun, run as usual
+ */
+
+ /* By default, we setlk WRLCK on [0,9], opening file RDWR.
+ */
+
+ int lock_cmd = 1;
+ int lock_rw = 1;
+ int lock_start = 0;
+ int open_rw = 1;
+ int testrun = 0;
+
+ /* We use semaphore to synchronize between getlk and setlk.
+ *
+ * Although we run getlk routine after running setlk routine
+ * in background, getlk still can be executed before setlk
+ * sometimes, which is invalid for our tests.
+ *
+ * In setlk routine, we wait getlk done, then exit, making sure
+ * the lock is still there when doing getlk.
+ *
+ * In getlk routine, we wait till setlk done firstly, making
+ * sure the lock is valid at that time, then we do getlk,
+ * after that, we tell setlk we are done, then exit.
+ */
+ key_t semkey;
+ unsigned short vals[2];
+ union semun arg;
+ int semid;
+ struct sembuf sop;
+
+ struct flock flk = {
+ .l_whence = SEEK_SET,
+ .l_start = 0,
+ .l_len = 10, /* lock range [0,9] */
+ .l_type = F_RDLCK,
+ .l_pid = 0,
+ };
+
+ int opt;
+
+ while((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "sgrwo:RWt")) != -1) {
+ switch(opt) {
+ case 's':
+ lock_cmd = 1;
+ break;
+ case 'g':
+ lock_cmd = 0;
+ break;
+ case 'r':
+ lock_rw = 0;
+ break;
+ case 'w':
+ lock_rw = 1;
+ break;
+ case 'o':
+ lock_start = atoi(optarg);
+ break;
+ case 'R':
+ open_rw = 0;
+ break;
+ case 'W':
+ open_rw = 1;
+ break;
+ case 't':
+ testrun = 1;
+ break;
+ default:
+ printf("Usage: %s [-sgrwo:RW] filename\n", argv[0]);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (lock_rw == 1)
+ flk.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+ else
+ flk.l_type = F_RDLCK;
+
+ if (open_rw == 0)
+ fd = open(argv[optind], O_RDONLY);
+ else
+ fd = open(argv[optind], O_RDWR);
+ if (fd == -1)
+ err_exit("open", errno);
+
+ /* In a testun, we do a fcntl getlk call and exit
+ * immediately no matter it succeeds or not.
+ */
+ if (testrun == 1) {
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_GETLK, &flk) < 0)
+ err_exit("test_ofd_getlk", errno);
+ if (fd > 0)
+ close(fd);
+ exit(0);
+ }
+
+ /* Init the semaphore, with key related to the same file.
+ * If the sem set has not been created, we initialnize it.
+ * If it exists, we semget again to get the exist one.
+ * To make sure getlk routine and setlk routine are looking
+ * at the same semaphore set in one single round of test.
+ */
+ if((semkey = ftok("ofd_key", 255)) == -1)
+ err_exit("ftok", errno);
+ semid = semget(semkey, 2, IPC_CREAT|IPC_EXCL);
+ if (semid < 0) {
+ /* The sem exists or errer happens. */
+ if (errno != EEXIST)
+ err_exit("semget0", errno);
+
+ semid = semget(semkey, 2, 0);
+ if (semid < 0)
+ err_exit("semget1", errno);
+ } else {
+ /* Init both new sem to 1. */
+ vals[0] = 1;
+ vals[1] = 1;
+ arg.array = vals;
+ if (semctl(semid, 2, SETALL, arg) == -1)
+ err_exit("init sem", errno);
+ }
+
+ /* setlk */
+ if (lock_cmd == 1) {
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLKW, &flk) < 0)
+ err_exit("ofd_setlkw", errno);
+
+ /* set sem0 to 0 after setlk done */
+ arg.val = 0;
+ if (semctl(semid, 0, SETVAL, arg) == -1)
+ err_exit("set sem0 0", errno);
+
+ /* wating sem 1 to be zero */
+ sop.sem_num = 1;
+ sop.sem_op = 0;
+ sop.sem_flg = 0;
+ if (semop(semid, &sop, 1) == -1)
+ err_exit("wait sem1 0", errno);
+
+ /* remove sem set after one round of test */
+ if (semctl(semid, 2, IPC_RMID, arg) == -1)
+ err_exit("rmid", errno);
+ }
+
+ /* getlck */
+ if (lock_cmd == 0) {
+ flk.l_start = lock_start;
+
+ /* wating sem 0 to be zero */
+ sop.sem_num = 0;
+ sop.sem_op = 0;
+ sop.sem_flg = 0;
+ if (semop(semid, &sop, 1) == -1)
+ err_exit("wait sem0 0", errno);
+
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_GETLK, &flk) < 0)
+ err_exit("ofd_getlk", errno);
+
+ /* set sem1 to 0 after getlk done */
+ arg.val = 0;
+ if (semctl(semid, 1, SETVAL, arg) == -1)
+ err_exit("set sem1 0", errno);
+
+ switch (flk.l_type) {
+ case F_UNLCK:
+ printf("lock could be placed\n");
+ break;
+ case F_RDLCK:
+ printf("get rdlck\n");
+ break;
+ case F_WRLCK:
+ printf("get wrlck\n");
+ break;
+ default:
+ printf("error\n");
+ close(fd);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ close(fd);
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tests/generic/466 b/tests/generic/466
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..8903af4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/generic/466
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+#! /bin/bash
+# FS QA Test 466
+#
+# Test OFD locks, F_OFD_SETLK/F_OFD_GETLK
+#
+# The basic idea is placing a type of lock in one process,
+# eg WRLCK, on a testfile in SCRATCH_MNT, then do fcntl
+# getlk with a type of lock, eg RDLCK, in another process.
+# In the end, we check the returned flock.l_type by getlk
+# to see if the lock mechanism works fine.
+#
+# We can also test these situations:
+# that the two locks are conflicting or not;
+# that open testfile RDONLY or RDWR.
+#
+#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Copyright (c) 2017 Red Hat Inc. All Rights Reserved.
+#
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+# published by the Free Software Foundation.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
+# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
+#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
+#
+
+seq=`basename $0`
+seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
+echo "QA output created by $seq"
+
+here=`pwd`
+tmp=/tmp/$$
+status=1 # failure is the default!
+trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
+
+_cleanup()
+{
+ rm -f ofd_key
+ cd /
+ rm -f $tmp.*
+}
+
+# get standard environment, filters and checks
+. ./common/rc
+. ./common/filter
+
+# remove previous $seqres.full before test
+rm -f $seqres.full
+
+# Modify as appropriate.
+_supported_fs generic
+_supported_os Linux
+_require_scratch
+_require_test_program "t_ofd_locks"
+_require_ofd_locks
+
+# real QA test starts here
+_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
+
+# prepare a 4k test file
+$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xFF 0 4096" \
+ $SCRATCH_MNT/testfile >> $seqres.full 2>&1
+
+do_test()
+{
+ local soptions="$1"
+ local goptions="$2"
+ rm -f fifo
+ echo $* >> $seqres.full 2>&1
+ # -s : do setlk
+ src/t_ofd_locks -s $soptions $SCRATCH_MNT/testfile &
+ # -g : do getlk
+ src/t_ofd_locks -g $goptions $SCRATCH_MNT/testfile
+ wait
+}
+
+# For the semaphore to sync getlk and getlk
+touch ofd_key
+
+# Always setlk at range [0,9], getlk at range [0,9] or [20,29].
+# To open file RDONLY or RDWR should not break the locks.
+
+# -w : operate on F_WRLCK
+# -r : operate on F_RDLCK
+# -R : open file RDONLY
+# -W : open file RDWR
+# -o : file offset where the lock starts
+
+# setlk wrlck [0,9], getlk wrlck [0,9], expect wrlck
+do_test "-w" "-w"
+# setlk wrlck [0,9], getlk wrlck [20,29], expect unlck
+do_test "-w" "-w -o 20"
+# setlk wrlck [0,9], getlk rdlck [0,9], expect wrlck
+do_test "-w" "-r"
+# setlk wrlck [0,9], getlk rdlck [20,29], expect unlck
+do_test "-w" "-r -o 20"
+# setlk rdlck [0,9], getlk wrlck [0,9], expect rdlck
+do_test "-r -R" "-w -R"
+do_test "-r" "-w"
+# setlk rdlck [0,9], getlk wrlck [20,29], expect unlck
+do_test "-r -R" "-w -o 20 -R"
+do_test "-r" "-w -o 20"
+# setlk rdlck [0,9], getlk rdlck [0,9], expect unlck
+do_test "-r -R" "-r -R"
+do_test "-r" "-r"
+# setlk rdlck [0,9], getlk rdlck [0,9], expect unlck
+do_test "-r -R" "-r -o 20 -R"
+do_test "-r" "-r -o 20"
+
+# success, all done
+status=0
+exit
diff --git a/tests/generic/466.out b/tests/generic/466.out
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..89c77fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/generic/466.out
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+QA output created by 466
+get wrlck
+lock could be placed
+get wrlck
+lock could be placed
+get rdlck
+get rdlck
+lock could be placed
+lock could be placed
+lock could be placed
+lock could be placed
+lock could be placed
+lock could be placed
diff --git a/tests/generic/group b/tests/generic/group
index fbe0a7f..b716440 100644
--- a/tests/generic/group
+++ b/tests/generic/group
@@ -468,3 +468,4 @@
463 auto quick clone dangerous
464 auto rw
465 auto rw quick aio
+466 auto quick
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-19 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-11 8:42 [PATCH] generic: add OFD lock tests Xiong Zhou
2017-10-13 9:13 ` [PATCH v2] " Xiong Zhou
2017-10-16 10:28 ` Eryu Guan
2017-10-19 8:30 ` Xiong Zhou [this message]
2017-10-24 8:16 ` [PATCH v3] " Eryu Guan
2017-10-27 4:59 ` [PATCH v4] " Xiong Zhou
2017-10-28 9:29 ` Eryu Guan
2017-10-29 2:34 ` Xiong Zhou
2017-11-10 2:46 ` [PATCH v5] " Xiong Zhou
2017-11-15 9:13 ` Eryu Guan
2018-02-13 14:10 ` [PATCH v6] " Xiong Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1508401836-5114-1-git-send-email-xzhou@redhat.com \
--to=xzhou@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox