From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] overlay/04{1,3,4}: enable xino feature
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 17:16:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524061018-20413-3-git-send-email-amir73il@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1524061018-20413-1-git-send-email-amir73il@gmail.com>
These tests check for constant inode number on copy up with nonsamefs
layer configuration. This problem is fixes only when opting-in with the
xino=on mount option, so let the tests enable the mount option on new
kernels and notrun on old kernels.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---
tests/overlay/041 | 15 +++++++++++----
tests/overlay/043 | 13 ++++++++++---
tests/overlay/044 | 15 +++++++++++----
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/overlay/041 b/tests/overlay/041
index 4e72348..9de61f7 100755
--- a/tests/overlay/041
+++ b/tests/overlay/041
@@ -70,7 +70,14 @@ _scratch_mkfs
upperdir=$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT/$OVL_UPPER
workdir=$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT/$OVL_WORK
-_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir
+# enabling xino in this test requires that base filesystem inode numbers will
+# not use bit 63 in inode number of the test files, because bit 63 is used by
+# overlayfs to indicate the layer. Let's just assume that this is true for all
+# tested filesystems and if we are wrong, the test may fail
+_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o xino=on ||
+ _notrun "mount overlay with xino failed"
+_check_scratch_fs_option "xino" || \
+ _notrun "faild to enable xino"
test_dir=$SCRATCH_MNT/test_dir/
@@ -171,7 +178,7 @@ subdir_d=$($here/src/t_dir_type $pure_lower_dir $pure_lower_subdir_st_ino)
_scratch_unmount
# check overlayfs
-_overlay_check_scratch_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir
+_overlay_check_scratch_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o xino=on
# Verify pure lower residing in dir which has another lower layer
middir=$OVL_BASE_TEST_DIR/$seq-ovl-mid
@@ -189,7 +196,7 @@ _scratch_mkfs
upperdir=$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT/ovl-upper
workdir=$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT/ovl-work
-_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $middir:$lowerdir $upperdir $workdir
+_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $middir:$lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o xino=on
# Copy up test_dir
touch $test_dir/test_file
@@ -212,7 +219,7 @@ subdir_d=$($here/src/t_dir_type $pure_lower_dir $pure_lower_subdir_st_ino)
echo "Pure lower in dir which has another lower layer: Invalid d_ino reported for subdir"
# check overlayfs
-_overlay_check_scratch_dirs "$middir:$lowerdir" $upperdir $workdir
+_overlay_check_scratch_dirs "$middir:$lowerdir" $upperdir $workdir -o xino=on
echo "Silence is golden"
status=0
diff --git a/tests/overlay/043 b/tests/overlay/043
index 46df686..66771c0 100755
--- a/tests/overlay/043
+++ b/tests/overlay/043
@@ -83,7 +83,14 @@ _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
upperdir=$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT/$OVL_UPPER
workdir=$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT/$OVL_WORK
-_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir
+# enabling xino in this test requires that base filesystem inode numbers will
+# not use bit 63 in inode number of the test files, because bit 63 is used by
+# overlayfs to indicate the layer. Let's just assume that this is true for all
+# tested filesystems and if we are wrong, the test may fail
+_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o xino=on || \
+ _notrun "mount overlay with xino failed"
+_check_scratch_fs_option "xino" || \
+ _notrun "faild to enable xino"
FILES="dir file symlink chrdev blkdev fifo socket"
@@ -150,13 +157,13 @@ check_inode_numbers $testdir $tmp.after_copyup $tmp.after_move
# Verify that the inode numbers survive a mount cycle
$UMOUNT_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT
-_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir
+_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o xino=on
# Compare inode numbers before/after mount cycle
check_inode_numbers $testdir $tmp.after_move $tmp.after_cycle
# check overlayfs
-_overlay_check_scratch_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir
+_overlay_check_scratch_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o xino=on
echo "Silence is golden"
status=0
diff --git a/tests/overlay/044 b/tests/overlay/044
index 2ab3035..0e74128 100755
--- a/tests/overlay/044
+++ b/tests/overlay/044
@@ -99,8 +99,15 @@ _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
upperdir=$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT/$OVL_UPPER
workdir=$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT/$OVL_WORK
-# Enable overlay index feature to prevent breaking hardlinks on copy up
-_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o index=on
+# Enable overlay index feature to prevent breaking hardlinks on copy up.
+# enabling xino in this test requires that base filesystem inode numbers will
+# not use bit 63 in inode number of the test files, because bit 63 is used by
+# overlayfs to indicate the layer. Let's just assume that this is true for all
+# tested filesystems and if we are wrong, the test may fail
+_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o index=on,xino=on || \
+ _notrun "mount overlay with xino failed"
+_check_scratch_fs_option "xino" || \
+ _notrun "faild to enable xino"
rm -f $tmp.*
@@ -124,8 +131,8 @@ check_ino_nlink $SCRATCH_MNT $tmp.before $tmp.after_one
# Verify that the hardlinks survive a mount cycle
$UMOUNT_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT
-_overlay_check_scratch_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o index=on
-_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o index=on
+_overlay_check_scratch_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o index=on,xino=on
+_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o index=on,xino=on
echo "== After mount cycle =="
cat $FILES
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-18 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-18 14:16 [PATCH 0/2] Fix failing overlay nonsamefs fstests Amir Goldstein
2018-04-18 14:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] common/rc: factor out _require_scratch_fs_option Amir Goldstein
2018-04-18 14:16 ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2018-04-25 5:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] overlay/04{1,3,4}: enable xino feature Eryu Guan
2018-04-25 15:32 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-04-18 14:23 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix failing overlay nonsamefs fstests Miklos Szeredi
2018-04-18 14:30 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-04-23 13:37 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-04-23 14:50 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-04-23 15:12 ` Miklos Szeredi
2018-04-23 15:57 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-04-23 19:05 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1524061018-20413-3-git-send-email-amir73il@gmail.com \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox