From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] overlay/04{1,3,4}: enable xino feature
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 23:53:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524722007-30891-5-git-send-email-amir73il@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1524722007-30891-1-git-send-email-amir73il@gmail.com>
These tests check for constant inode number on copy up with nonsamefs
layer configuration. This problem is fixes only when opting-in with the
xino=on mount option, so let the tests enable the mount option on new
kernels and notrun on old kernels.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---
tests/overlay/041 | 16 ++++++++++++----
tests/overlay/043 | 16 ++++++++++++----
tests/overlay/044 | 16 ++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/overlay/041 b/tests/overlay/041
index f3be746..78f8179 100755
--- a/tests/overlay/041
+++ b/tests/overlay/041
@@ -70,7 +70,15 @@ _scratch_mkfs
upperdir=$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT/$OVL_UPPER
workdir=$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT/$OVL_WORK
-_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir
+# Enabling xino in this test requires that base filesystem inode numbers will
+# not use bit 63 in inode number of the test files, because bit 63 is used by
+# overlayfs to indicate the layer. Let's just assume that this is true for all
+# tested filesystems and if we are wrong, the test may fail.
+_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o xino=on ||
+ _notrun "mount overlay with xino failed"
+# Not using _check_scratch_fs_option because it uses grep -w
+_fs_options $SCRATCH_DEV | grep -q "xino=on" || \
+ _notrun "failed to enable xino"
test_dir=$SCRATCH_MNT/test_dir/
@@ -171,7 +179,7 @@ subdir_d=$($here/src/t_dir_type $pure_lower_dir $pure_lower_subdir_st_ino)
$UMOUNT_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT
# check overlayfs
-_overlay_check_scratch_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir
+_overlay_check_scratch_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o xino=on
# Verify pure lower residing in dir which has another lower layer
middir=$OVL_BASE_TEST_DIR/$seq-ovl-mid
@@ -186,7 +194,7 @@ mkdir -p $lowerdir/test_dir/pure_lower_dir/subdir
_scratch_mkfs
-_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $middir:$lowerdir $upperdir $workdir
+_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $middir:$lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o xino=on
# Copy up test_dir
touch $test_dir/test_file
@@ -209,7 +217,7 @@ subdir_d=$($here/src/t_dir_type $pure_lower_dir $pure_lower_subdir_st_ino)
echo "Pure lower in dir which has another lower layer: Invalid d_ino reported for subdir"
# check overlayfs
-_overlay_check_scratch_dirs "$middir:$lowerdir" $upperdir $workdir
+_overlay_check_scratch_dirs "$middir:$lowerdir" $upperdir $workdir -o xino=on
echo "Silence is golden"
status=0
diff --git a/tests/overlay/043 b/tests/overlay/043
index f70ee7f..c865b51 100755
--- a/tests/overlay/043
+++ b/tests/overlay/043
@@ -85,8 +85,16 @@ _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
upperdir=$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT/$OVL_UPPER
workdir=$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT/$OVL_WORK
-# Enable redirect_dir for renaming a merge directory
-_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o redirect_dir=on
+# Enable redirect_dir for renaming a merge directory.
+# Enabling xino in this test requires that base filesystem inode numbers will
+# not use bit 63 in inode number of the test files, because bit 63 is used by
+# overlayfs to indicate the layer. Let's just assume that this is true for all
+# tested filesystems and if we are wrong, the test may fail.
+_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o redirect_dir=on,xino=on || \
+ _notrun "mount overlay with xino failed"
+# Not using _check_scratch_fs_option because it uses grep -w
+_fs_options $SCRATCH_DEV | grep -q "xino=on" || \
+ _notrun "failed to enable xino"
FILES="dir file symlink chrdev blkdev fifo socket"
@@ -153,13 +161,13 @@ check_inode_numbers $testdir $tmp.after_copyup $tmp.after_move
# Verify that the inode numbers survive a mount cycle
$UMOUNT_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT
-_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o redirect_dir=on
+_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o redirect_dir=on,xino=on
# Compare inode numbers before/after mount cycle
check_inode_numbers $testdir $tmp.after_move $tmp.after_cycle
# check overlayfs
-_overlay_check_scratch_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o redirect_dir=on
+_overlay_check_scratch_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o redirect_dir=on,xino=on
echo "Silence is golden"
status=0
diff --git a/tests/overlay/044 b/tests/overlay/044
index 2ab3035..bcc30ac 100755
--- a/tests/overlay/044
+++ b/tests/overlay/044
@@ -99,8 +99,16 @@ _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
upperdir=$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT/$OVL_UPPER
workdir=$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT/$OVL_WORK
-# Enable overlay index feature to prevent breaking hardlinks on copy up
-_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o index=on
+# Enable overlay index feature to prevent breaking hardlinks on copy up.
+# Enabling xino in this test requires that base filesystem inode numbers will
+# not use bit 63 in inode number of the test files, because bit 63 is used by
+# overlayfs to indicate the layer. Let's just assume that this is true for all
+# tested filesystems and if we are wrong, the test may fail.
+_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o index=on,xino=on || \
+ _notrun "mount overlay with xino failed"
+# Not using _check_scratch_fs_option because it uses grep -w
+_fs_options $SCRATCH_DEV | grep -q "xino=on" || \
+ _notrun "failed to enable xino"
rm -f $tmp.*
@@ -124,8 +132,8 @@ check_ino_nlink $SCRATCH_MNT $tmp.before $tmp.after_one
# Verify that the hardlinks survive a mount cycle
$UMOUNT_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT
-_overlay_check_scratch_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o index=on
-_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o index=on
+_overlay_check_scratch_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o index=on,xino=on
+_overlay_scratch_mount_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir -o index=on,xino=on
echo "== After mount cycle =="
cat $FILES
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-26 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-26 5:53 [PATCH v2 0/4] Fix failing overlay nonsamefs fstests Amir Goldstein
2018-04-26 5:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] common/rc: factor out _require_scratch_fs_option Amir Goldstein
2018-04-26 5:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] overlay/041: fix call to _overlay_check_scratch_dirs Amir Goldstein
2018-04-26 5:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] overlay/043: require and enable redirect_dir Amir Goldstein
2018-04-26 5:53 ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2018-04-27 2:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] overlay/04{1,3,4}: enable xino feature Eryu Guan
2018-04-27 2:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Fix failing overlay nonsamefs fstests Eryu Guan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1524722007-30891-5-git-send-email-amir73il@gmail.com \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox