From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: djwong@kernel.org, guaneryu@gmail.com
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org, guan@eryu.me
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: make sure syncfs(2) passes back super_operations.sync_fs errors
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 20:30:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <164740143497.3371809.2959237196772812909.stgit@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <164740142940.3371809.12686819717405148022.stgit@magnolia>
From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
This is a regression test to make sure that nonzero error returns from
a filesystem's ->sync_fs implementation are actually passed back to
userspace when the call stack involves syncfs(2).
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
---
tests/xfs/839 | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/xfs/839.out | 2 ++
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/xfs/839
create mode 100644 tests/xfs/839.out
diff --git a/tests/xfs/839 b/tests/xfs/839
new file mode 100755
index 00000000..9bfe93ef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/xfs/839
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+#! /bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Copyright (c) 2022 Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
+#
+# FS QA Test No. 839
+#
+# Regression test for kernel commits:
+#
+# 5679897eb104 ("vfs: make sync_filesystem return errors from ->sync_fs")
+# 2d86293c7075 ("xfs: return errors in xfs_fs_sync_fs")
+#
+# During a code inspection, I noticed that sync_filesystem ignores the return
+# value of the ->sync_fs calls that it makes. sync_filesystem, in turn is used
+# by the syncfs(2) syscall to persist filesystem changes to disk. This means
+# that syncfs(2) does not capture internal filesystem errors that are neither
+# visible from the block device (e.g. media error) nor recorded in s_wb_err.
+# XFS historically returned 0 from ->sync_fs even if there were log failures,
+# so that had to be corrected as well.
+#
+# The kernel commits above fix this problem, so this test tries to trigger the
+# bug by using the shutdown ioctl on a clean, freshly mounted filesystem in the
+# hope that the EIO generated as a result of the filesystem being shut down is
+# only visible via ->sync_fs.
+#
+. ./common/preamble
+_begin_fstest auto quick shutdown
+
+# real QA test starts here
+
+# Modify as appropriate.
+_require_xfs_io_command syncfs
+_require_scratch_nocheck
+_require_scratch_shutdown
+
+# Reuse the fs formatted when we checked for the shutdown ioctl, and don't
+# bother checking the filesystem afterwards since we never wrote anything.
+_scratch_mount
+$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c 'shutdown -f ' -c syncfs $SCRATCH_MNT
+
+# success, all done
+status=0
+exit
diff --git a/tests/xfs/839.out b/tests/xfs/839.out
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f275cdcc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/xfs/839.out
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+QA output created by 839
+syncfs: Input/output error
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-16 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-16 3:30 [PATCHSET 0/2] fstests: new tests for kernel 5.17 Darrick J. Wong
2022-03-16 3:30 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2022-03-23 2:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: make sure syncfs(2) passes back super_operations.sync_fs errors Zorro Lang
2022-03-24 21:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-03-16 3:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] generic: ensure we drop suid after fallocate Darrick J. Wong
2022-03-23 3:06 ` Zorro Lang
2022-03-26 18:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-04-19 17:32 [PATCHSET v2 0/2] fstests: new tests for kernel 5.18 Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-19 17:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: make sure syncfs(2) passes back super_operations.sync_fs errors Darrick J. Wong
2022-04-19 18:17 ` Amir Goldstein
2022-04-19 19:10 ` Zorro Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=164740143497.3371809.2959237196772812909.stgit@magnolia \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guan@eryu.me \
--cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox