From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs/195: Use XFSDUMP_PROG instead of xfsdump directly
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 12:38:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141016103806.GB6085@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141014121527.GH17506@dastard>
On Tue 14-10-14 23:15:27, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:12:04PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:58:08PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 05:27:18PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > Use appropriate environment variable (XFSDUMP_PROG) instead of hardcoding
> > > > 'xfsdump' name. This also makes the test fail graciously when xfsdump
> > > > isn't installed.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > > > ---
> > > > tests/xfs/195 | 3 ++-
> > > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/195 b/tests/xfs/195
> > > > index c7bc7b8..b86aedb 100755
> > > > --- a/tests/xfs/195
> > > > +++ b/tests/xfs/195
> > > > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> > > > #
> > > > _do_dump()
> > > > {
> > > > - xfsdump -l 0 -s d -F \
> > > > + $XFSDUMP_PROG -l 0 -s d -F \
> > > > -L prova -M prova \
> > > > -f $TEST_DIR/dumpfile -e -v excluded_files=debug $TEST_DIR \
> > > > | grep "ino $inum" \
> > > > @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ _do_dump()
> > > > # get standard environment, filters and checks
> > > > . ./common/rc
> > > > . ./common/filter
> > > > +. ./common/dump
> > >
> > > This causes the test to fail, because _do_dump() is defined in
> > > common/dump as well. I'll fix the conflict...
> >
> > Actually, this has problems with duplicate _cleanup functions too,
> > so It' would just be better to check for xfsdump being defined
> > directly rather than including common/dump....
>
> I've dropped this for now. Can you rework it, Jan? Maybe best to use
> _require_command or something like that as common/dump implies
> certain specific usage patterns and functions are used, which this
> test doesn't follow...
OK, I'll try to fix it differently. I just wonder why things work for me
here...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-16 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-01 15:27 [PATCH] xfs/195: Use XFSDUMP_PROG instead of xfsdump directly Jan Kara
2014-10-01 15:27 ` [PATCH] xfs/287: Make test fail graciously when xfsdump isn't installed Jan Kara
2014-10-14 11:58 ` [PATCH] xfs/195: Use XFSDUMP_PROG instead of xfsdump directly Dave Chinner
2014-10-14 12:12 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-14 12:15 ` Dave Chinner
2014-10-16 10:38 ` Jan Kara [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141016103806.GB6085@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox