From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
axboe@fb.com
Subject: Re: ramdisk problems in 4.0-rc1? (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs/104: log size too small for 4k sector drives)
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 12:09:24 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150302010924.GQ4251@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F2CD85.3060303@plexistor.com>
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 10:27:49AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 02/27/2015 02:58 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> It looks like the system anticipates that ramdisk "should
> >> not have these events"
> >
> > Right, but not because it's a ramdisk. Those events should not be
> > occurring because I'm not creating or destroying devices, I'm not
> > changing partition tables, I'm not resizing ramdisks or partitions,
> > and so on. I'm simply mkfs'ing, mounting and unmounting filesystems
> > on the ramdisks - nothing should be generating device based udev
> > events...
> >
> > Finding the trigger that is causing these events will tell us what
> > the bug is -
>
> > restricting the config won't help, especially as DAX
> > will *always* be enabled on my test machines as it's something
> > needed in my test matrix.
>
> No the "if DAX" is for the 4k thing. The enablement of the uevents is
> with a new "part_show" module parameter (See patch-1).
Sure, but that doesn't answer my question: what is generating device
level uevents when all I'm doing is mkfs/mount/umount on the device?
> > I'm not sure how to go about finding that
> > trigger right now and as such I won't really have time to look at it
> > until after lsfmm/vault...
> >
>
> I'll try to reproduce this here. What Fedora version do I need?
I'm running debian unstable w/ systemd-215 on the particular test
machine that is hitting this problem.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-02 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-24 22:54 [PATCH v2 0/4] fstests: sector size fixes and whiteouts Dave Chinner
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs/104: log size too small for 4k sector drives Dave Chinner
2015-02-25 16:11 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-25 22:32 ` ramdisk problems in 4.0-rc1? (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs/104: log size too small for 4k sector drives) Dave Chinner
2015-02-25 23:31 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-25 23:43 ` Dave Chinner
2015-02-26 7:46 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26 17:23 ` Brian Foster
2015-03-01 8:49 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-01 14:28 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-27 0:58 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-01 8:27 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-02 1:09 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2015-03-02 9:40 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26 8:14 ` [PATCH] brd: Re-instate ram disk visibility option (part_show) Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26 8:41 ` [PATCH] brd: Only request 4K sectors if DAX is enabled Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-26 8:48 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-27 0:23 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-01 8:30 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: don't output mkfs sector sizes into golden output Dave Chinner
2015-02-27 18:56 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs/049: umount -d fails when kernel wins teardown race Dave Chinner
2015-02-27 18:56 ` Brian Foster
2015-02-24 22:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] generic: Add rudimetary RENAME_WHITEOUT test Dave Chinner
2015-02-27 18:57 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150302010924.GQ4251@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=boaz@plexistor.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox