From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41946 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758892AbcCVMAV (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 08:00:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 20:00:14 +0800 From: Eryu Guan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fstests: test fsync on overlayfs merged directory Message-ID: <20160322120014.GJ11419@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> References: <1458581952-18638-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@kernel.org> <1458582625-22039-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@kernel.org> <20160322030023.GF11419@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Filipe Manana Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" , Filipe Manana List-ID: On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:07:06AM +0000, Filipe Manana wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:00 AM, Eryu Guan wrote: ... > >> + > >> +# real QA test starts here > >> +_supported_fs generic > > > > The supported fs should be "overlay"? overlay/001 has the same issue > > though. > > Yeah, I copied it from 001. And that's a question I made myself but > forgot later to investigate. Since you authored test 001, can you > confirm if it's a mistake or is it really supposed to be 'overlay'? It's my mistake in overlay/001, it should be overlay. Thanks, Eryu