From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] generic/338-346: Add richacl tests
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:34:51 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160322233451.GX11812@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458127565-24149-4-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:26:05PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>
> +_require_richacl()
> +{
> + GETRICHACL_PROG=`set_prog_path getrichacl`
> + _require_command "$GETRICHACL_PROG" getrichacl
> + SETRICHACL_PROG=`set_prog_path setrichacl`
> + _require_command "$SETRICHACL_PROG" setrichacl
> +}
> +
> +_setup_scratch_richacl_xfs()
> +{
> + _scratch_mkfs_xfs_supported -m richacl=1 >/dev/null 2>&1 \
> + || _notrun "mkfs.xfs doesn't have richacl feature"
> +
> + _scratch_mkfs_xfs -m richacl=1 >/dev/null 2>&1
> + _scratch_mount >/dev/null 2>&1 \
> + || _notrun "kernel doesn't support richacl feature on $FSTYP"
> +}
> +
> +__setup_scratch_richacl()
> +{
> + _scratch_mkfs -O richacl >/dev/null 2>&1 \
> + || _notrun "can't mkfs $FSTYP with option -O richacl"
> + _scratch_mount >/dev/null 2>&1 \
> + || _notrun "kernel doesn't support richacl feature on $FSTYP"
> +}
> +
> +_setup_scratch_richacl()
> +{
> + _require_scratch
> + case "$FSTYP" in
> + xfs) _setup_scratch_richacl_xfs
> + ;;
> + ext4) __setup_scratch_richacl
> + ;;
> + *) _notrun "this test requires richacl support on \$SCRATCH_DEV"
> + ;;
> + esac
> +}
These are all _require functions. Please don't combine test
requirements with initial test condition setup, nor hide
requirements inside other requirements. If a test runs some
other _require_scratch_foo() after these richacl checks, then the
scratch device wil be in an undefined state. IOws, these
functions are:
_require_richacl_prog()
_require_scratch_richacl_xfs()
_require_scratch_richacl_ext4()
_require_scratch_richacl()
_scratch_mkfs_richacl()
And the test needs to do this as setup:
_require_scratch
_require_scratch_richacl
_require_richacl_prog
_scratch_mkfs_richacl
_scratch_mount
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..88e4141
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/343
.....
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +
> +_supported_fs generic
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_require_richacl
> +_setup_scratch_richacl
> +
> +cd $SCRATCH_MNT
> +
> +r() {
> + echo "--- runas -u 99 -g 99 $*"
> + $here/src/runas -u 99 -g 99 -- "$@"
> +}
Need to add _require_runas here, and generic/026, generic/093,
generic/237 and shared/051 also need their open coded checks for the
executable changed to _require_runas. (multiple tests in this
patch need this).
> diff --git a/tests/generic/group b/tests/generic/group
> index 727648c..e892ae9 100644
> --- a/tests/generic/group
> +++ b/tests/generic/group
> @@ -340,3 +340,12 @@
> 335 auto quick metadata
> 336 auto quick metadata
> 337 auto quick metadata
> +338 auto richacl
> +339 auto richacl
> +340 auto richacl
> +341 auto richacl
> +342 auto richacl
> +343 auto richacl
> +344 auto richacl
> +345 auto richacl
> +346 auto richacl
MOst of thse tests take only a couple of seconds to run, right? If
so, then they should probably also be in the quick group.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-22 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-16 11:26 [PATCH v5 0/3] Richacl tests Andreas Gruenbacher
2016-03-16 11:26 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] Rename output file templates to match TEST.out* Andreas Gruenbacher
2016-03-16 11:26 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] xfs/191: Remove obsolete nfs4acl tests Andreas Gruenbacher
2016-03-16 11:26 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] generic/338-346: Add richacl tests Andreas Gruenbacher
2016-03-22 23:34 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160322233451.GX11812@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox