From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: fdmanana@kernel.org
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Pass --retry to dmsetup when removing flakey and error devices
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:28:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160407212857.GC761@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460009548-20668-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 07:12:28AM +0100, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
>
> When running multiple tests using dm's flakey target, often (very rarely)
> I was getting an error when a test tried to setup a dm flakey target,
> resulting in the following messages in the test's .out.bad file:
>
> device-mapper: reload ioctl on flakey-test failed: Device or resource busy
> Command failed
> failed to create flakey device
>
> Upon further investigation it turns out that it was because the previous
> test that ran had failed to remove the flakey device because the device
> was being used at the time but this has not made that previous test fail
> because we simply redirect the stderr (and stdout) to /dev/null and don't
> fail if the dmsetup remove command exits with a non-zero status.
> The device was in use, when the test attempted to remove it, by an udev
> rule (btrfs udev rule).
And that's why we have $UDEV_SETTLE_PROG calls before removing the
dm device, which it appears _dmerror_init() does not have.
If there are things other than udev holding the device open, then we
ned to find what they are first rather than trying to ignore them...
> Fix this by passing the option --retry to dmsetup remove, which serves to
> deal with such cases. From dmsetup's man page:
>
> "If an attempt to remove a device fails, perhaps because a process run
> from a quick udev rule temporarily opened the device, the --retry
> option will cause the operation to be retried for a few seconds before
> failing."
It also talks about udev, so running $UDEV_SETTLE_PROG before remove
should prevent this from happening. If it is not sufficient, then we
need to understand why it is not sufficient, not blindly hack around
it.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-07 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-07 6:12 [PATCH] Pass --retry to dmsetup when removing flakey and error devices fdmanana
2016-04-07 21:28 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160407212857.GC761@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox