From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:36349 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753520AbcEZIEZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2016 04:04:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 01:04:24 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] xfs: test rmap behavior when multiple bmbt records map to a single rmapbt record Message-ID: <20160526080424.GA8469@infradead.org> References: <146424222237.6278.4174636124436241002.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <146424226290.6278.15051221437554845000.stgit@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <146424226290.6278.15051221437554845000.stgit@birch.djwong.org> Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: david@fromorbit.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com List-ID: > --- a/src/t_immutable.c > +++ b/src/t_immutable.c > @@ -38,10 +38,10 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > -#include > #include > > #ifndef XFS_SUPER_MAGIC How does this belong into the patch? > diff --git a/tests/xfs/group b/tests/xfs/group > index f0ca410..0e34f9a 100644 > --- a/tests/xfs/group > +++ b/tests/xfs/group > @@ -288,3 +288,4 @@ > 853 auto quick clone > 854 auto quick clone > 855 auto clone > +856 auto clone rmap reflink This is the only test in the reflink group, how is this group different from the clone one?