From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39530 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750974AbcFGDp6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2016 23:45:58 -0400 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E90F164389 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 03:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:45:55 +0800 From: Eryu Guan Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: update xfs/096 for new behaviour Message-ID: <20160607034555.GK5140@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> References: <1464858659-610-1-git-send-email-jtulak@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1464858659-610-1-git-send-email-jtulak@redhat.com> Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Tulak Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:10:59AM +0200, Jan Tulak wrote: > Because we recently changed how mkfs behaves when it gets incorrect/invalid > values, update the expected output to reflect the change. This will break test with old-behavior xfsprogs. But I'm not sure what the best solution is.. And it seems that generic/054 and generic/055 are failing because of the same reason, if so, fix them together? Thanks, Eryu