From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 17:37:55 +0800 From: Eryu Guan Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/17] xfs/128: cycle_mount the scratch device, not the test device Message-ID: <20160803093755.GN27776@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> References: <146914477514.11762.3144320628851923350.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <146914482100.11762.3197784490090678443.stgit@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <146914482100.11762.3197784490090678443.stgit@birch.djwong.org> To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: david@fromorbit.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com List-ID: On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:47:01PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > This test uses the scratch device, so cycle that, not the test dev. > This is also a xfs_fsr test, so put it in the fsr group. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong > --- > tests/xfs/128 | 7 ++++--- > tests/xfs/group | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/128 b/tests/xfs/128 > index 8758d7e..2e756d5 100755 > --- a/tests/xfs/128 > +++ b/tests/xfs/128 > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ _pwrite_byte 0x61 0 $((blks * blksz)) $testdir/file1 >> $seqres.full > _cp_reflink $testdir/file1 $testdir/file2 > _cp_reflink $testdir/file2 $testdir/file3 > _cp_reflink $testdir/file3 $testdir/file4 > -_test_cycle_mount > +_scratch_cycle_mount > free_blocks1=$(stat -f $testdir -c '%f') > > md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch > @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ c04=$(_md5_checksum $testdir/file4) > echo "CoW the reflink copies" > _pwrite_byte 0x62 $blksz $blksz $testdir/file2 >> $seqres.full > _pwrite_byte 0x63 $(( blksz * (blks - 1) )) $blksz $testdir/file3 >> $seqres.full > -_test_cycle_mount > +_scratch_cycle_mount > free_blocks2=$(stat -f $testdir -c '%f') > > md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch > @@ -97,11 +97,12 @@ c14=$(_md5_checksum $testdir/file4) > > echo "Defragment" > lsattr -l $testdir/ | _filter_scratch | _filter_spaces > +filefrag -v $testdir/file* >> $seqres.full Is this intentional? Use $FILEFRAG_PROG instead and add _require_command "$FILEFRAG_PROG" "filefrag" at the beginning of the test? Thanks, Eryu > $XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file1 >> $seqres.full > $XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file2 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably breaks the link > $XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file3 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably breaks the link > $XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file4 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably ignores this file > -_test_cycle_mount > +_scratch_cycle_mount > free_blocks3=$(stat -f $testdir -c '%f') > > md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch > diff --git a/tests/xfs/group b/tests/xfs/group > index aa3b3ec..5ccf3d6 100644 > --- a/tests/xfs/group > +++ b/tests/xfs/group > @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ > 125 fuzzers > 126 fuzzers > 127 auto quick clone > -128 auto quick clone > +128 auto quick clone fsr > 129 auto quick clone > 130 fuzzers clone > 131 auto quick clone >