From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54196 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753106AbcHPD0W (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2016 23:26:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:26:20 +0800 From: Eryu Guan Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs/263: test xfs_quota "state" command Message-ID: <20160816032620.GL27776@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> References: <20160815053626.GF27776@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> <5efd2e7f-5cd9-2a01-4a8f-b9308f3bd13d@sandeen.net> <6979e124-ee73-94e3-1c09-1dfb2d0b368a@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6979e124-ee73-94e3-1c09-1dfb2d0b368a@sandeen.net> Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Eric Sandeen , fstests List-ID: On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:15:17PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > strange, that's the kind of thing the kernel patch was intended to fix. > > > > I meant to retest from scratch on bleeding-edge upstream, but too many > > things got in the way today. Will try again tomorrow... > > Can you recheck? I built everything from scratch on a freshly-installed > box, and with the patches mentioned, it passes for me. > > oh, but try V2 of the xfsprogs patch ;) (I'll send that in a minute). The v2 patch of xfsprogs works! Test passed for me too this time. Thanks, Eryu