From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50832 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1033727AbcKAHU5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 03:20:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:20:55 +0800 From: Eryu Guan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] xfstests: btrfs/134: add test for incremental send which renames a directory already being deleted Message-ID: <20161101072055.GQ27776@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> References: <1477619046-16375-1-git-send-email-robbieko@synology.com> <1477619046-16375-5-git-send-email-robbieko@synology.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1477619046-16375-5-git-send-email-robbieko@synology.com> Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: robbieko Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 09:44:06AM +0800, robbieko wrote: > From: Robbie Ko > > Test that an incremental send operation dosen't work because > it tries to rename a directory which is already deleted. > > This test exercises scenarios used to fail in btrfs and are fixed by > the following patch for the linux kernel: > > "Btrfs: incremental send, add generation check for inode is waiting for move." I was testing with v4.9-rc1+ kernel and btrfs-progs v4.6. Seems above patch is not merged in 4.9-rc1 kernel, but test passed for me, is that expected? Thanks, Eryu