From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:37846 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966438AbcKLQcs (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Nov 2016 11:32:48 -0500 Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:32:48 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: new xfs/103 failure Message-ID: <20161112163248.GA24737@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-ID: After recently upgrading the xfs and xfsprogs trees I get reproducible xfs/103 failures because the n flags is not reported. Does anyone else see this? root@testvm:~/xfstests# diff -u tests/xfs/103.out /root/xfstests/results//xfs/103 --- tests/xfs/103.outs# 2016-03-29 13:59:30.451720622 +0000stests/results//xfs/10 +++ /root/xfstests/results//xfs/103.out.bad 2016-11-12 16:30:37.032780388 +0000 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ *** mount *** testing nosymlinks directories *** setting nosymlinks bit ---n-- SCRATCH_MNT/nosymlink +----- SCRATCH_MNT/nosymlink ln: creating symbolic link 'SCRATCH_MNT/nosymlink/target': Operation not permitted *** 1st listing... SCRATCH_MNT