public inbox for fstests@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/10] fstests: btrfs/104: Use _btrfs_check_scratch_qgroup to replace open codes
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:33:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161129073303.14776-9-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161129073303.14776-1-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 tests/btrfs/104 | 11 ++---------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/btrfs/104 b/tests/btrfs/104
index 6afaa02..a5d2070 100755
--- a/tests/btrfs/104
+++ b/tests/btrfs/104
@@ -152,14 +152,7 @@ _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume delete $SCRATCH_MNT/snap1
 sleep 45
 
 _scratch_unmount
-
-# generate a qgroup report and look for inconsistent groups
-#  - don't use _run_btrfs_util_prog here as it captures the output and
-#    we need to grep it.
-$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG check --qgroup-report $SCRATCH_DEV 2>&1 | \
-			grep -E -q "Counts for qgroup.*are different"
-if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
-	status=0
-fi
+_btrfs_check_scratch_qgroup
+status=0
 
 exit
-- 
2.7.4




  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-29  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-29  7:32 [PATCH 00/10] Enhance btrfs qgroup test group coverage to support more mount options Qu Wenruo
2016-11-29  7:32 ` [PATCH 01/10] fstests: common: Introduce function to check qgroup correctness Qu Wenruo
2016-11-29  8:16   ` Eryu Guan
2016-11-29  8:44     ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-29 21:01   ` Dave Chinner
2016-11-30  0:56     ` Qu Wenruo
2016-11-30  1:23       ` Dave Chinner
2016-11-29  7:32 ` [PATCH 02/10] fstests: btrfs/017: Use new _btrfs_check_scratch_qgroup function Qu Wenruo
2016-11-29  7:32 ` [PATCH 03/10] fstests: btrfs/022: Add extra qgroup verification after each work Qu Wenruo
2016-11-29  7:32 ` [PATCH 04/10] fstests: btrfs/028: Use new wrapped _btrfs_check_scratch_qgroup function Qu Wenruo
2016-11-29  7:32 ` [PATCH 05/10] fstests: btrfs/042: Add extra qgroup verification Qu Wenruo
2016-11-29  7:32 ` [PATCH 06/10] fstests: btrfs/091: Use _btrfs_check_scratch_qgroup other than fixed golden output Qu Wenruo
2016-11-29  7:33 ` [PATCH 07/10] fstests: btrfs/099: Add extra verification for qgroup Qu Wenruo
2016-11-29  7:33 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2016-11-29  7:33 ` [PATCH 09/10] fstests: btrfs/122: Use _btrfs_check_scratch_qgroup to replace open code Qu Wenruo
2016-11-29  7:33 ` [PATCH 10/10] fstests: btrfs/123: " Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161129073303.14776-9-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox