From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Gstir <david@sigma-star.at>,
Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] generic: add utilities for testing filesystem encryption
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 23:05:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161213070533.GA6366@birch.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161213054155.GM29149@eguan.usersys.redhat.com>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 01:41:55PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 11:21:04AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > Add utility functions for testing filesystem-level encryption via the
> > common API currently supported by ext4 and f2fs, in development for
> > ubifs and planned for xfs. Setting and getting encryption policies will
> > use new commands being added to xfs_io, while adding and removing
> > encryption keys will use keyctl.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> > ---
> > common/config | 1 +
> > common/encrypt | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 138 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 common/encrypt
> >
> > diff --git a/common/config b/common/config
> > index f0f08d2..3727ec0 100644
> > --- a/common/config
> > +++ b/common/config
> > @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ export DEBUGFS_PROG="`set_prog_path debugfs`"
> > export UUIDGEN_PROG="`set_prog_path uuidgen`"
> > export GETRICHACL_PROG="`set_prog_path getrichacl`"
> > export SETRICHACL_PROG="`set_prog_path setrichacl`"
> > +export KEYCTL_PROG="`set_prog_path keyctl`"
> >
> > # use 'udevadm settle' or 'udevsettle' to wait for lv to be settled.
> > # newer systems have udevadm command but older systems like RHEL5 don't.
> > diff --git a/common/encrypt b/common/encrypt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..e18068e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/common/encrypt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
> > +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > +#
> > +# Common functions for testing filesystem-level encryption
> > +#
> > +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > +# Copyright (c) 2016 Google, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> > +#
> > +# Author: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> > +#
> > +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> > +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
> > +#
> > +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
> > +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> > +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> > +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> > +#
> > +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> > +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
> > +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
> > +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > +
> > +_require_encryption()
>
> I think it's better to name it as _require_scratch_encryption (like
> _require_scratch_reflink), so that we know it takes use of SCRATCH_DEV
> and tests against it to check if encryption is supported.
Agree, since the function is only capable of testing the scratch device.
--D
> > +{
> > + # The 'test_dummy_encryption' mount option interferes with trying to use
> > + # encryption for real, even if we are just trying to get/set policies
> > + # and never put any keys in the keyring. So skip the real encryption
> > + # tests if the 'test_dummy_encryption' mount option was specified.
> > + if echo "$MOUNT_OPTIONS" | grep -q "test_dummy_encryption"; then
> > + _notrun "Dummy encryption is on; skipping real encryption tests"
> > + fi
>
> There's a helper _exclude_scratch_mount_option to do this.
>
> > +
> > + # Make a filesystem on the scratch device with the encryption feature
> > + # enabled. If this fails then probably the userspace tools (e.g.
> > + # e2fsprogs or f2fs-tools) are too old to understand encryption.
> > + if ! _scratch_mkfs_encrypted &>>$seqres.full; then
> > + _notrun "$FSTYP userspace tools do not support encryption"
> > + fi
> > +
> > + # Try to mount the filesystem. If this fails then either the kernel
> > + # isn't aware of encryption, or the mkfs options were not compatible
> > + # with encryption (e.g. ext4 with block size != PAGE_SIZE).
> > + if ! _scratch_mount &>>$seqres.full; then
> > + _notrun "kernel is unaware of $FSTYP encryption feature, " \
> > + "or mkfs options are not compatible with encryption"
> > + fi
> > +
> > + # The kernel may be aware of encryption without supporting it. For
> > + # example, for ext4 this is the case with kernels configured with
> > + # CONFIG_EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION=n. Detect support for encryption by trying
> > + # to set an encryption policy. (For ext4 we could instead check for the
> > + # presence of /sys/fs/ext4/features/encryption, but this is broken on
> > + # some older kernels and is ext4-specific anyway.)
> > + mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/tmpdir
> > + if $XFS_IO_PROG -c set_encpolicy $SCRATCH_MNT/tmpdir \
> > + 2>&1 >>$seqres.full | \
> > + egrep -q 'Inappropriate ioctl for device|Operation not supported'
> > + then
> > + _notrun "kernel does not support $FSTYP encryption"
> > + fi
> > + rmdir $SCRATCH_MNT/tmpdir
> > + _scratch_unmount
> > +}
> > +
> > +_scratch_mkfs_encrypted()
> > +{
> > + _scratch_mkfs -O encrypt
>
> Do case switch based on FSTYP (like what you do in v1 patch), just don't
> override MKFS_OPTIONS as Dave pointed out.
>
> _scratch_mkfs_encrypted()
> {
> case $FSTYP in
> ext4|f2fs)
> _scratch_mkfs -O encrypt
> ;;
> *)
> _notrun "No encryption support for $FSTYP"
> ;;
> esac
> }
>
> > +
> > +# Give the invoking shell a new session keyring. This makes any keys we add to
> > +# the session keyring scoped to the lifetime of the test script.
> > +_new_session_keyring()
> > +{
> > + $KEYCTL_PROG new_session >>$seqres.full
> > +}
> > +
> > +#
> > +# Generate a random encryption key, add it to the session keyring, and print out
> > +# the resulting key descriptor (example: "8bf798e1a494e1ec"). Requires the
> > +# keyctl program. It's assumed the caller has already set up a test-scoped
> > +# session keyring using _new_session_keyring.
> > +#
> > +_generate_encryption_key()
> > +{
> > + # Generate a key descriptor (16 character hex string)
> > + local keydesc=""
> > + for ((i = 0; i < 8; i++)); do
> > + keydesc="${keydesc}$(printf "%02x" $(( $RANDOM % 256 )))"
> > + done
> > +
> > + # Generate the actual encryption key (64 bytes)
> > + local raw=""
> > + for ((i = 0; i < 64; i++)); do
> > + raw="${raw}\\x$(printf "%02x" $(( $RANDOM % 256 )))"
> > + done
> > +
> > + #
> > + # Add the key to the session keyring. The required structure is:
> > + #
> > + # #define FS_MAX_KEY_SIZE 64
> > + # struct fscrypt_key {
> > + # u32 mode;
> > + # u8 raw[FS_MAX_KEY_SIZE];
> > + # u32 size;
> > + # } __packed;
> > + #
> > + # The kernel ignores 'mode' but requires that 'size' be 64.
> > + #
> > + # Keys are named $FSTYP:KEYDESC where KEYDESC is the 16-character key
> > + # descriptor hex string. Newer kernels (ext4 4.8 and later, f2fs 4.6
> > + # and later) also allow the common key prefix "fscrypt:" in addition to
> > + # their filesystem-specific key prefix ("ext4:", "f2fs:"). It would be
> > + # nice to use the common key prefix, but for now use the filesystem-
> > + # specific prefix to make it possible to test older kernels...
> > + #
> > + local big_endian=$(echo -ne '\x11' | od -tx2 | head -1 | \
> > + cut -f2 -d' ' | cut -c1 )
> > + if (( big_endian )); then
> > + local mode='\x00\x00\x00\x00'
> > + local size='\x00\x00\x00\x40'
> > + else
> > + local mode='\x00\x00\x00\x00'
> > + local size='\x40\x00\x00\x00'
> > + fi
> > + echo -n -e "${mode}${raw}${size}" |
> > + $KEYCTL_PROG padd logon $FSTYP:$keydesc @s >>$seqres.full
> > + echo $keydesc
> > +}
> > +
> > +# Unlink an encryption key from the session keyring, given its key descriptor.
> > +_unlink_encryption_key()
> > +{
> > + local keydesc=$1
> > + local keyid=$($KEYCTL_PROG search @s logon $FSTYP:$keydesc)
> > + $KEYCTL_PROG unlink $keyid >>$seqres.full
> > +}
> > --
> > 2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-13 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-05 19:21 [PATCH v3 0/6] Add filesystem-level encryption tests Eric Biggers
2016-12-05 19:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] generic: add utilities for testing filesystem encryption Eric Biggers
2016-12-13 5:41 ` Eryu Guan
2016-12-13 7:05 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2016-12-05 19:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] generic: test setting and getting encryption policies Eric Biggers
2016-12-13 5:59 ` Eryu Guan
2016-12-05 19:21 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] generic: test validation of encryption policy structure Eric Biggers
2016-12-05 19:21 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] generic: test encrypted file access Eric Biggers
2016-12-05 19:21 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] generic: test enforcement of one encryption policy per tree Eric Biggers
2016-12-13 6:07 ` Eryu Guan
2016-12-05 19:21 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] generic: test for weaknesses in filesystem encryption Eric Biggers
2016-12-13 6:12 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] Add filesystem-level encryption tests Eryu Guan
2016-12-15 0:31 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161213070533.GA6366@birch.djwong.org \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@sigma-star.at \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=mhalcrow@google.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox