From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pg0-f68.google.com ([74.125.83.68]:33708 "EHLO mail-pg0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751257AbcLUVgF (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:36:05 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:36:01 -0800 From: Eric Biggers Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] generic: test for weaknesses in filesystem encryption Message-ID: <20161221213601.GB136777@gmail.com> References: <1481833585-39148-1-git-send-email-ebiggers3@gmail.com> <1481833585-39148-7-git-send-email-ebiggers3@gmail.com> <20161219072628.GC1859@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161219072628.GC1859@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Eryu Guan Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o , Jaegeuk Kim , Richard Weinberger , David Gstir , Michael Halcrow , Eric Sandeen , Eric Biggers , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 03:26:28PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > > Can you please send an updated patch 6/6? Otherwise the whole series > look good to me! I'm going to let the patchset sit in the list for > another week and push them out to upstream in next fstests update, if > there's no further comments from others. > > Thanks, > Eryu I just changed patch 6/6 but I went ahead and sent out v5 of the series so that people don't mix up the different patches. +Cc linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Also, would it be possible to get the xfs_io patch merged into xfsprogs at about the same time? Ultimately, both the xfstests and xfsprogs changes are needed to run the new tests; without the xfsprogs change they'll all be skipped. Thanks, Eric