From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/102: Update strict check
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:38:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170105093843.GU1859@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483606569-6515-1-git-send-email-yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 04:56:09PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote:
> Low memory may lead to "written less bytes than
> requested". We only care about if xfs_io returned
> ENOSPC or not, so we can check stderr of xfs_io
> instead of stdout.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
I thought this was fine, but I'm not sure now. Because I recalled that
there was an ext4 bug in dax mount exposed by generic/102, and it was
the case that xfs_io returned less bytes than requested. See commit
e84dfbe ext4: retry block allocation for failed DIO and DAX writes
If we discard all the xfs_io stdout, we may miss such bugs in the
future. But I'd like to see more comments on this from filesystem
developers.
> ---
> tests/generic/102 | 5 +++--
> tests/generic/102.out | 20 --------------------
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/generic/102 b/tests/generic/102
> index 3cdc2ba..104edc0 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/102
> +++ b/tests/generic/102
> @@ -54,8 +54,9 @@ _scratch_mount
> for ((i = 0; i < 10; i++)); do
> echo "loop $i" >>$seqres.full
>
> - $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -b 1m 0 400m" "$SCRATCH_MNT"/file | \
> -_filter_xfs_io | _filter_scratch
> + out="$($XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -b 1m 0 400m" "$SCRATCH_MNT"/file 2>&1)"
> + echo $out >>$seqres.full 2>&1
> + echo $out | grep -q "No space left on device" && echo "pwrite failed with ENOSPC"
If we want to discard xfs_io stdout, just redirect it to /dev/null,
ENOSPC error messgage will go to stderr and break the golden image
anyway.
Thanks,
Eryu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-05 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-05 8:56 [PATCH] generic/102: Update strict check Xiao Yang
2017-01-05 9:38 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2017-01-11 7:49 ` Xiao Yang
2017-01-11 8:24 ` [PATCH v2] " Xiao Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170105093843.GU1859@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox