From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>, fstests <fstests@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: cleanup tmp files in tests
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:24:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170112042430.GW1859@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxjqYFxCedvvYo8=YgoXDCPXogozAuVGd842sJLGQ9ipFQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:46:23PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi Eric and Amir,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 08:57:31PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >> Hi Eryu,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 11:45:07AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> >> > $tmp.* files should be removed in _cleanup() even if the test is not
> >> > using any $tmp.* file explicitly, because common helper functions
> >> > may take use of them too.
> >> >
> >> > So cleanup tmp files properly in tests, and add a _cleanup()
> >> > function and trap it on exit if the test doesn't do so, to make all
> >> > tests consistent on the way they do cleanup.
> >> >
> >> > Also remove other tmp files used by the tests and the harness so
> >> > that we leave no new tmp files in /tmp dir after a full test run.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Why exactly can't the boilerplate go in a preamble file which is sourced by all
> >> the tests? For example common/preamble containing something like:
> >
> > Thanks for your review! As you two are basically suggesting the same
> > solution, so I reply to you together.
> >
> > I agree that we can do a common/preamble for all tests to source, but I
> > don't think we need to do that and it's not worth the effort.
> >
> > IMO, we define and setup the tests in the tests themselves, not in a
> > common/preamble file, which makes the tests clear and easy to read. We
> > don't want to "hide" any setups in a common file and to be a "surprise"
> > to the reader, we don't have to look around for a certain setup.
> >
>
> The motivation for your work is the fact that tmp files are being created
> in a way that is "hidden" from the test author and therefore, IMO,
> the cleanup of those temp files should also be in a common function
> that is "hidden" from the test author.
[Sorry, I got back to this late.]
That's a good point, so I think what should be done is let common
functions clean up their tmp files, so there's no hidden usage of $tmp
and tests only need to remove $tmp.* used explicitly in the tests.
I checked all the common functions, there're only two that are not
cleaning up their tmp files properly, _do() and run_fsx().
I'll send v2 patch for review, which will be a much simpler patch.
Thanks,
Eryu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-12 4:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-06 3:45 [PATCH] fstests: cleanup tmp files in tests Eryu Guan
2017-01-07 4:57 ` Eric Biggers
2017-01-09 10:17 ` Eryu Guan
2017-01-09 10:46 ` Amir Goldstein
2017-01-12 4:24 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2017-01-08 13:06 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170112042430.GW1859@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox