From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic: test encryption key revocation during concurrent I/O
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:18:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170315101849.GO14226@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170315002551.9423-1-ebiggers3@gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 05:25:51PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
>
> Add a test which revokes a keyring key while other processes are
> performing I/O on an encrypted file that was "unlocked" using that key.
> This crashes unpatched kernels with filesystem encryption enabled, so
> place it in the "dangerous" group.
>
> [The patch to fix this is titled "fscrypt: remove broken support for
> detecting keyring key revocation" but hasn't been merged yet; we may
> want to wait a bit before merging this test.]
Agreed.
>
> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
> Cc: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
This looks good to me, and it crashed my 4.11-rc2 test host very
quickly. Just one minor comment below.
> ---
> common/encrypt | 8 ++++
> tests/generic/500 | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/generic/500.out | 2 +
> tests/generic/group | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 120 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/generic/500
> create mode 100644 tests/generic/500.out
...
> +# remove previous $seqres.full before test
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs ext4 f2fs
supported fs should be generic if it's in generic dir. If it only
supports some specific filesystems, then it should go to shared dir.
Thanks,
Eryu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-15 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-15 0:25 [PATCH] generic: test encryption key revocation during concurrent I/O Eric Biggers
2017-03-15 10:18 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2017-03-15 17:57 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170315101849.GO14226@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhalcrow@google.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox